![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Thank you Jim, for sharing all that knowledge.
I will follow your assumption on the " but there were of course exceptions " part. Whether 'my' author mentioning could be a fantasy, i find more than one source admitting that the pipe-back sword was fragile indeed. "As a fighting weapon, the 1822 Pattern was rather unsatisfactory, the blade being far too weak and the hilt bars affording little protection". https://www.militariahub.com/british...officer-sword/ Besides the fragility issue, this could mean (these) infantry swords were still "serviceable" .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
I would like to say that i found the support text of this item when it was last included in an auction.
"Spanish, with a repurposed sword blade". Judging by the fact that also the Spanish had their version of the 1822 pipe-back, it all makes sense ... i would say. . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,662
|
Quote:
as they say here in Texas, "..well....there ya go!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
All's well that ends well
.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|