A flintlock pistol ... with a Portuguese lock.

fernando · 24th November 2009, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dmitry

That is mighty early for a captive ramrod. I was under the impression they became popular closer to the end of 18th century, than to the middle.

It appears that the captive ramrod (officially) appeared by the 1800's.
Most possibly this pistol 'was called' to service by the time of Napoleonic invasions and, following the contemporary Britsh use, had the ramrod swivel applied; and maybe also the lanyard ring extracted.
Many things happen during many weapon's history.
Fernando

fernando · 25th November 2009, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fernando

It appears that the captive ramrod (officially) appeared by the 1800's.
Most possibly this pistol 'was called' to service by the time of Napoleonic invasions and, following the contemporary Britsh use, had the ramrod swivel applied; and maybe also the lanyard ring extracted.
Many things happen during many weapon's history.
Fernando

In a second thought, the lanyard ring wouldn't have been extracted but, instead, had its 'nipple' added to the butt same time as the ramrod swivel.
Fernando

fernando · 12th November 2017, 07:32 PM

By the time i acquired this pistol i knew nothing about these things (still i don't) and my ignorance persuated to believe and state most of the above posted nonsense. I would say most, as obviously what concerns the lock and his well know smith master are a straight fact.
As for the rest, i regret tat i failed to revisit this thread and correct a few vital details, as learnt a couple months later from someone more qualified to have an opinion on these items. So quoting the man:
To start with, the stock is a late clumsy work. The barrel is typical of Liege 1740-1750; the ranmrod swivel a later addition. The brass butt cap would be Spanish. The 18th. century trigger guard typically Poruguese, but had its width trimmed, as was originally from a shoulder gun. Eventually the Portuguese lock was also the model for a musket.
And the more bombastic assessment was that the barrel, originally for a flint lock, was once modified to a percussion version and ... later converted back to serve again a flint lock. Go figure how this is plausible, and what knowledge needs an expert to notice these details, just by looking at a pistol.
In any case i could not go without reposition the truth, even this late; more important to assume what this pistol is not, than not necessarily what it is.

Pukka Bundook · 12th November 2017, 09:36 PM

Fernando,

It is still a wonderful piece, with a Fantastic and very robust lock.

These locks hold me in awe. So very strong and sure.

Best wishes,
Richard.

fernando · 12th November 2017, 09:54 PM

Thank you Richard

.

kronckew · 13th November 2017, 07:43 AM

british sea service pistols frequently had belt hooks, might this be a naval pistol?

fernando · 15th November 2017, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kronckew

british sea service pistols frequently had belt hooks, might this be a naval pistol?

Belt hooks used to abound in the Peninsula; not necessarily naval ... at all.
I have (and had) several examples in my little collection, monuted in the most diverse gun types.

.

corrado26 · 13th November 2017, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fernando

It appears that the captive ramrod (officially) appeared by the 1800's.

The earliest regulation pistol with a captive ramrod I know is the cavalry pistol M 1789 of Saxony
corrado26

12th November 2017, 07:32 PM	#3
fernando (deceased) Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Portugal Posts: 9,694	By the time i acquired this pistol i knew nothing about these things (still i don't) and my ignorance persuated to believe and state most of the above posted nonsense. I would say most, as obviously what concerns the lock and his well know smith master are a straight fact. As for the rest, i regret tat i failed to revisit this thread and correct a few vital details, as learnt a couple months later from someone more qualified to have an opinion on these items. So quoting the man: To start with, the stock is a late clumsy work. The barrel is typical of Liege 1740-1750; the ranmrod swivel a later addition. The brass butt cap would be Spanish. The 18th. century trigger guard typically Poruguese, but had its width trimmed, as was originally from a shoulder gun. Eventually the Portuguese lock was also the model for a musket. And the more bombastic assessment was that the barrel, originally for a flint lock, was once modified to a percussion version and ... later converted back to serve again a flint lock. Go figure how this is plausible, and what knowledge needs an expert to notice these details, just by looking at a pistol. In any case i could not go without reposition the truth, even this late; more important to assume what this pistol is not, than not necessarily what it is.

12th November 2017, 09:36 PM	#4
Pukka Bundook Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 803	Fernando, It is still a wonderful piece, with a Fantastic and very robust lock. These locks hold me in awe. So very strong and sure. Best wishes, Richard.

12th November 2017, 09:54 PM	#5
fernando (deceased) Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Portugal Posts: 9,694	Thank you Richard .

13th November 2017, 07:43 AM	#6
kronckew Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Room 101, Glos. UK Posts: 4,215	british sea service pistols frequently had belt hooks, might this be a naval pistol?