![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Quote:
AMEN! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,259
|
On advice of a friend, I've bent the upper guard quillion forward back in a more forward position; I also note that the photos above lack scale, the grip is comfortably two-handed at 7 in., and the 28.75 in. blade is heavy (and very sharp). It is not a nimble cutlass, it's a brutal hacker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
Hi Wayne, well you certainly fixed that and did a fine job of it, congratulations.
In my own estimation and I am by far NOT an expert I would be looking towards Vietnam for origin and age 19thc for your sword, the finish on the blade certainly has that tell tale finish seen on many Vietnam - Indo China regional swords, perhaps even what were the Cham regions, I like it, nice honest sword indeed. ![]() . Snody
Last edited by Maj-Biffy Snodgrass; 21st May 2023 at 05:10 PM. Reason: mistake |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 66
|
![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|