Karud dagger with unusual chased scabbard

[ariel]

Originally Posted by mariusgmioc

Or "CA karud with a scabbard redecorated with “Buddhist” repousse motives”.

On the Forum,- as you wish:-) I would not do it if I were to write a book on Central Asian weapons, but in informal exchanges,- no problem.

But I am glad we agree in principle

[mahratt]

Originally Posted by ariel

On the Forum,- as you wish:-) I would not do it if I were to write a book on Central Asian weapons, but in informal exchanges,- no problem.

It is a pity that we will not see your book on the arms of Central Asia. Undoubtedly, it would be a valuable work, given your vast experience.

Complementing your definition of the subject under discussion, I would clarify that the dagger under discussion is: "Karud. The place of production with a high degree of probability is Afghanistan (if you made us all happy with a book about the arms of the khanates of Central Asia, you would know why this dagger has nothing to do with the khanates) "The details of the scabbard are undoubtedly of Sino-Tibetan origin. The use of the item most likely took place in this region".

[Ian]

mahratt and ariel,

You are each getting very close to the line again! Both of you have had a post deleted in this thread for irrelevant or provocative material. Enough. Move on.

In the past we have closed threads because of your incessant arguing and attacking each other. In future, if you use threads to continue your arguing and sniping, the threads will remain open but you will both be gone from here permanently.
.

[ariel]

And, BTW, I frown upon the use of the term “Khyber knife” in books and other professional publications.
First, this moniker was given to it by the Brits who did not know of, or did not care about, its real name.
Second, it implies that this weapon was endemic specifically to the Khyber Pass area. In fact, it was produced and used in other Afghani areas, in CA Khanates ( somewhere here there was a photo of a whole slew of them sold as butcher meat choppers), in India and (in a slightly modified form) even in Persia ( See Fiegel, #2095, 2096).

Interestingly, “ ch’hura” is more correct: it is a word with Sanscritic roots meaning a knife.
In formal publications the native term “ selava” is, IMHO, mandatory. It is its true local name and, having learned it, we are obligated to use it.

I take my hat of to Indonesian and Philippine gurus who are very careful, almost persnickety, about terminology.

Again, in informal exchanges we can call it whatever is convenient for the occasion.

[mahratt]

Originally Posted by ariel

And, BTW, I frown upon the use of the term “Khyber knife” in books and other professional publications.
First, this moniker was given to it by the Brits who did not know of, or did not care about, its real name.
Second, it implies that this weapon was endemic specifically to the Khyber Pass area. In fact, it was produced and used in other Afghani areas, in CA Khanates ( somewhere here there was a photo of a whole slew of them sold as butcher meat choppers), in India and (in a slightly modified form) even in Persia ( See Fiegel, #2095, 2096).

Interestingly, “ ch’hura” is more correct: it is a word with Sanscritic roots meaning a knife.
In formal publications the native term “ selava” is, IMHO, mandatory. It is its true local name and, having learned it, we are obligated to use it.

I take my hat of to Indonesian and Philippine gurus who are very careful, almost persnickety, about terminology.

Again, in informal exchanges we can call it whatever is convenient for the occasion.

I'm sorry. But your "frown" is your personal problem. There are a number of established terms for well-known armes items. These terms allow everyone to determine without any problems what kind of arms it is even without its detailed description.
The use of native ethnic names of weapons is a "nice bonus", especially considering that in the same Afghanistan in its different regions the same one Khyber knife has been called by many different names.
Nevertheless, I am very glad that you have learned useful information from my book on the arms of Afghanistan.

And for reference, Khyber knives have never been produced in the khanates of Central Asia.

With Indonesia and the Philippines - everything is easier. The huge variety of forms of tribal swords and daggers, common in relatively small areas, has led to the fact that it turned out to be easier to use traditional ethnic names.


However, I think that this topic is not about the nomenclature of weapons. And I think you should not "clutter up" with our discussion the topic that francantolin opened