![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 37
|
![]()
Hi all!
Perhaps that is fake-I really don't know-but to me has been told that this perhaps is a modified flintlock? regards Markku |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I guess you are right Markku, in that the lock looks like having been converted from flintlock.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello
Of course, I differ. There is nothing on the plate that indicates that it is a transformation. The screw holes of the frizzen spring and the frizzen should be visible, conveniently covered. In addition, the decoration, the line of the border follows this, and the decoration with scrolls invades areas where supposedly should be the frizzen spring, usually without decoration. Also, it is strange the shape of the pump or massacre, to fix the chimney Affectionately |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
|
![]()
Hello
I would like to see an image of the inside of the lock Affectionately |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,802
|
![]()
Hi Markku,
Interesting pistol but I lean towards Fernando Ks suggestion of (not a fake) but perhaps a "put together" piece. The hammer does not appear to strike the nipple on the flat, but appears to strike at about 45degrees, which would not be normal. This could well be because the hammer is a replacement, and the throw is wrong. Also to me the stock shape does not seem to suit, particularly at the butt end, and the barrel tang does not fit properly. As far as Proof, and other marks are concerned, have you had a look UNDER the barrel, which is the most likely place (though not always) for them to be. Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|