![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]()
Obviously not interesting enough for comment
![]() Miguel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
The blade of the second one is appealing visually.
My 2 cents. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]()
Thanks Rick
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]()
Here must be one of the Indian Classics... The Tiger Tooth... In my view one of the most efficient dagger blades ever made. Often with a reinforced tip for piercing armour/thick clothing and with chiselled blade making for a lighter stronger blade. I assume the tang goes right through to the typical 3 lobed pommel and there is one I saw with a tiger striped horn hilt ~ at 2 below..
See1. http://www.oriental-arms.co.il/item.php?id=2495 See2. http://www.swordsantiqueweapons.com/s995_full.html Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]()
Thank you for your reply Ibrahiim and particularly for the links showing two very good examples of the "Tigers Tooth" dagger. Your assumption regarding the tang is correct.
Regards Miguel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]()
Hello Miguel,
Things are pretty clear for the Tiger Tooth dagger but I see no comments on the second one. In my oppinion, the second one is a more artistic XX century Indian interpretation of a Khukuri, hence not an etnographically correct Indian knife. Yet, it appears to have a very well made, sturdy and effective blade. If I were you, I would test the Tiger Tooth dagger for wootz, as most examples I have seen were made of wootz. Regards, Marius Last edited by mariusgmioc; 12th June 2017 at 04:13 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 735
|
![]()
For the second one please take a look here:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...highlight=pesh By the way, there were very good Indian antique Kukris as well. There are some examples on the Kukri Forum. But this one is of course different. The Tiger Tooth is pretty late too, I believe from the second half of the 19th century - beginning of 20th century. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
Miquel can tell which type his is. Thin blade, thin tang, not wootz. ![]() Thick blade and tang. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
The family of daggers known as Tiger Teeth are coming from North India, They are characterized by the slender curved blade, usually with reinforced edges and slightly thickened tip. The hilt is of a full tang style, with big bolsters, wide grip strap and very typical three lobed pommel. This specific one has a fine 8 1/2 inches blade forged from good wootz (Damascus) steel with fine gold koftgari work on the ricasso bolsters and grip strap. The grips are ivory. Total length 13 1/2 inches. ![]() Indian tiger tooth jambiya, 33cms long when sheathed. Out of the sheath the dagger is 30cms long with a broad 20cm blade. The hilt is a very well selected section of horn, cut and polished to resemble Tiger stripes. The blade has two broad central fullers, a chiseled forte and a thickened armour piercing point. The sheath is timber inners covered in a finely grained leather that is finished with a pierced brass end with a bud finial. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|