![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
I BID ON THIS ITEM BUT IT DIDN'T GO HIGHER BECAUSE OF THE SELLERS POOR PICTURE. I WOULD HAVE BID HIGHER IF I HAD BEEN ABLE TO SEE THE FILEWORK AND HANDLE. THIS IS A GOOD OLD UNTOUCHED MORO FIGHTING KRIS SWORD IT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE A PATTERENED BLADE BUT THE WORKMANSHIP IS GOOD AND I SUSPECT IT IS A FOLDED HAND FORGED BLADE WITH VERY SHARP EDGES EVEN AFTER ALL THESE YEARS. IT MAY BE FROM MINDANO ISLAND PHILLIPPINES OR BORNEO, BRUNI OR EVEN MALAYSIA THE MORO WERE PRESENT OR TRAVELED IN ALL AREAS.
THE FILEWORK IS DIFFERENT FROM ANY I HAVE SEEN AND VERY WELL DONE LOOKS A LOT LIKE MALAY WORK SOMEONE GOT A GOOD BUY ON THIS ONE WISH IT HAD BEEN ME. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
You are all right in that it is Moro. It is indeed from Mindanao, in fact it is Maranao in origin.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Thank you for your replies, Vandoo and Battara.
I felt rather sick, not bidding, as it seemed "right" to me, and I have not seen nicer file-work, but as I am unschooled in these weapons, thought I'd better hold off! Would the hilt have been better dressed at some time? The rather plain hilt was what piqued my interest actually,.....Not at all 'touristy'! Thank you again. Now I can go away and feel narked with myself for not bidding! Last edited by Pukka Bundook; 14th November 2010 at 03:03 PM. Reason: To add a few lines. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,272
|
![]()
It is my guess that it isn't the original hilt and maybe a later replacement.
![]() It will come the next chance to get a nice Moro kris for a good price. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I agree with Sajen that this work on the hilt is later and the original stuff was stripped.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Richard,
Quote:
While the quality of the file work does look good and the special style is certainly of interest, I'd guess that this is a 20th c. blade. The separation line does look a bit weird to me and I'm far from convinced that this blade really has a seperate gangya rather than an engraved line... Hilt does look like a makeshift repair, indeed. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I agree with you Kai in that the blade is probably 20c, perhaps 1920s. However, the separation line does not look like the typical engraved line to me. Better close ups of the line might help us solve the problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Thank you again, for sharing your knowlege and advice so freely.
Reading your replies and the other recent posts on Philippine weaponry has already opened my eyes to quite a lot! Thank you, Gentlemen, for your generosity!! Richard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Certainly not aimed at the 'pleasure travelers' market . Make do or do without . They made do . ![]() Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|