Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st January 2018, 04:17 PM   #1
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 598
Default Indian Moghul Blade?

I recently acquired this dagger and it poses some questions for me.
First, the heavy 10" blade with a swollen armor piercing tip and relief work has some type of strange forging pattern; it does not appear to be chemically etched as it is multi-dimensional.Next, the blade seems to be incorrectly set into the handle, however, the bonding material appears to be old and organic, so I was wondering if perhaps the bottom edge had been broken by some type of trauma.The handle is worn but has traces of silver scrolling.
I have never valued metal handled weapons, as I viewed them just above tourist grade, however, this appears to be a decent blade, and if confirmed, I may want to get it professionally fixed as opposed to me attempting a repair.
Attached Images
            
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2018, 06:14 PM   #2
Bob A
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 157
Default

A few observations, from one with little background:

The blade seems somewhat on the crude side to me. For all its design elements, the execution is not nearly so sharp as I'm used to seeing on blades with that level of ornament. Also, the ornament does not have the "carved" look that is typical of the ones I'm familiar with.

Steel handles on daggers seem more often to be a Persian thing to me, to the point that I was looking for some animal figures on the blade. The koftgari does seem to have suffered from use, though it's hard to tell on my screen.

The side clips of the hilt also seem odd to my eye. Seen on swords, but in my admittedly limited experience I don't recall seeing that sort of thing on short arms.

Not very helpful I suppose. Take it for what it may be worth.
Bob A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2018, 06:40 PM   #3
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 598
Default

All of your observations seem valid to me, Thanks.
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2018, 12:14 AM   #4
Rick
Member
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,610
Default

I think it's a married piece.

The pattern does appear to me to be etched; the blade is too thin where it joins the handle.
Workmanship on the blade is too crude or hurried in execution as Bob has mentioned.
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2018, 01:40 AM   #5
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 598
Default

That would certainly explain the misalignment; I previously hadn't thought that it had been chemically etched because it was fairly deep and it had a strange pattern.Thank you for your insights.
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2018, 09:44 AM   #6
mariusgmioc
Member
 
mariusgmioc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,103
Default

My estimate is 19th century fake wootz blade. Definitely not Mughal.

Happy new year!

Marius
mariusgmioc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2018, 11:01 AM   #7
drac2k
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 598
Default

Do you think it is Persian as well and do you believe it to be as old as 19th century or more modern? Thanks
drac2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.