Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25th May 2015, 05:08 PM   #1
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 685
Default Flanged Mace for comment

Got that interesting piece recently.

What it is exactly?

Lenght 65 cm.
Hollow construction, but quite heavy.
It has a drilled hole on the heft, perhaps a later addition.

I would like to know the origin of the piece. Is it european? Seems so, but I saw very similiar indopersian or turkish pieces.

Any opinions?
Attached Images
       
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2015, 05:17 PM   #2
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CSA Consulate, Rm. 101, Glos. UK: p.s. - Real Dogs Have Feathering.
Posts: 3,050
Default

looks very heavy - have you weighed it? the perspective may be making it look heavier thanit is. like the re-enforced points.

i'd hate to have to swing that more than a few times, my enemy would just push me over and poke me with something sharp. my few maces are under a kilo (2.2 lbs)
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2015, 06:26 PM   #3
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 7,519
Default

These maces, even with a hollow haft, can be rather heavy. There is a variety of examples in the Wallace Collection, with seven flanges head sets and hafts with a length similar to the one posted, weighing between 1,260 and 1,540 grams.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2015, 09:02 PM   #4
CSinTX
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 152
Default

It would be European or a copy in style of.

The hole would be correct but it seems the later examples have it too.

How are the flanges attached? They should each be inserted in to individual slots.

Does the haft have a seam that runs longways? Most (I dont know if all) hafts were rolled into a cylinder from a flat piece resulting in a lengthwise seam.

Best,
Casey
CSinTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2015, 03:56 PM   #5
Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Member
 
Ibrahiim al Balooshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,322
Send a message via MSN to Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valjhun
Got that interesting piece recently.

What it is exactly?

Lenght 65 cm.
Hollow construction, but quite heavy.
It has a drilled hole on the heft, perhaps a later addition.

I would like to know the origin of the piece. Is it european? Seems so, but I saw very similiar indopersian or turkish pieces.

Any opinions?


Salaams Valjhun....Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_weapons There is a mace in this form on that page. Ottoman.
There is another at http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showt...lace+Collection at post #50 also Ottoman.
Regards,
Ibrahiim al Balooshi.

Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi : 27th May 2015 at 04:07 PM.
Ibrahiim al Balooshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2015, 04:25 PM   #6
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CSA Consulate, Rm. 101, Glos. UK: p.s. - Real Dogs Have Feathering.
Posts: 3,050
Default

lots of gorgeous weapons in those links. way above my paygrade.

the 3 'ottoman flanged maces' in the wiki link remind me of my more mundain 'onion' headed steel mace: (top - or left)

i gather you mean the gold one (bottom - or right) which looks very similar to the slightly more distressed one originally posted. i not it does not appear to have the re-inforced points to the flanges - i would guess it was not expected the owner would ever need to actually use it. he must have had people to do that for him so he wouldn't have to.
Attached Images
  
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2015, 06:00 PM   #7
CSinTX
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 152
Default

Some examples-

http://www.hermann-historica-archiv...&db=kat56_p.txt

http://www.hermann-historica-archiv...&db=kat56_p.txt

The small holes on the flanges of yours are a little concerning. I can't recall seeing those in an original piece but I could be wrong.
Attached Images
 
CSinTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2015, 05:12 AM   #8
Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Member
 
Ibrahiim al Balooshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,322
Send a message via MSN to Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSinTX
Some examples-

http://www.hermann-historica-archiv...&db=kat56_p.txt

http://www.hermann-historica-archiv...&db=kat56_p.txt

The small holes on the flanges of yours are a little concerning. I can't recall seeing those in an original piece but I could be wrong.



Salaams CSinTX, Spot on Sir !

Regards,
Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Ibrahiim al Balooshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2015, 10:20 AM   #9
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 685
Default

Hello,

Thank you for your replies.

The mace weights a little less than 2kg.

The flanges are attached correctly, each inserted to its individual slot.
The reiforced points are also attached individually

No lenghtwise seam visible on the haft, there is some copper soldering visible at the pommel.

The mace is incredibly similar to the one from HH, postet above.
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2015, 04:55 PM   #10
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 935
Default

hello,

The weight of the mace is too heavy, which should have a maximum of around 1.2 kg and most are lighter than 1 kg.


the shaft of this type is hollow/tubular and formed by rolling or hammering a flat section of metal around a cylindrical former, so there must be a seam at the shaft along the length direction!

The flanges of the macehead of this type must be fitted in slots cutted in the shaft, from the top down through the metal, and are fixed with copper solder.

Iam sorry but regarding to the weight and the lack of a longitudinal seam.
I think it is a subsequent reproduction, 19th or 20thC.

best regards
Jasper
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2015, 11:25 AM   #11
Roland_M
Member
 
Roland_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 520
Default

Hello Jasper,

I am very sorry to correct you, but the average weight of a european flanged mace is around 1.5 kg and more.
The mace must be so heavy, because the mace is originally intended for penetrate or at least pressing dents in a plate armour. The thickness of a tempered european plate armour is between 1.5 an 2 mm.

A battlefield mace with a weight of less than 1.2 kg would be too lightweight against plate armour.


Best regards Roland
Roland_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2015, 06:26 AM   #12
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland_M
Hello Jasper,

I am very sorry to correct you, but the average weight of a european flanged mace is around 1.5 kg and more.
The mace must be so heavy, because the mace is originally intended for penetrate or at least pressing dents in a plate armour. The thickness of a tempered european plate armour is between 1.5 an 2 mm.

A battlefield mace with a weight of less than 1.2 kg would be too lightweight against plate armour.


Best regards Roland


Hi Roland,

you may correct me, but it must of course be supported in order to convince me.
1.5 kg average and more you have mentioned is not correct,
where did you find this digit?

Clive Thomas has written a wonderful article on maces in park lane arms and armor fair cataloque of 2014. I've also spoken to Clive about the weights of the different maces, because what he found was much lighter then we both expected.

Quote Clive page 21 "In General it could be said that the solid shafted examples are about 52.5 cm in avarage overall length and weigh around 1,050kg, whilst the tubular types are approximately 50cm and 560g, respectively" unquote

the type under discussion is oakeshott M2 and/or Clive Thomas B2
this type was usually larger around 60cm+ and heavier then the earlier ones
but will average not go over the maximum weight found of 1.2-1.3 KG
some examples from the article.


best,
Attached Images
            

Last edited by cornelistromp : 13th June 2015 at 07:20 AM.
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2015, 03:03 PM   #13
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 7,519
Default

I know nothing of these things but ...

Don't in any case, besides the number of flanges, the length of the shaft and or that of the entire mace have great influence in the weight variation ?

A few examples in the Wallace collection read:

A982 - seven flanges - total length 63.5 cms. - weight 1.470 Kg.
A983 - seven flanges - total length 60.4 cms. - weight 1.260 Kg.
A984 - seven flanges - total length 63.5 cms. - weight 1.540 Kg.
A985 - eigth flanges - haft length 45 cms. - weight 1.860 Kg.

.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by fernando : 13th June 2015 at 03:18 PM.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2015, 05:33 PM   #14
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 935
Default

yes like i mentioned in post #12 this type M2 was usually larger around 60cm+ and heavier then the earlier ones.

Wallace A985 is 0.86kg, not 1.86kg, the heaviest mace in Wallace is A979 with 1.67 KG.

best,
Attached Images
 

Last edited by cornelistromp : 14th June 2015 at 05:26 PM.
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2015, 06:23 PM   #15
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 7,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp
Wallace A945 is 0.86kg, not 1.86kg,

You mean A985. In my 1962 book version is 1.86Kg, (4:11/2).


Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp
the heaviest mace in Wallace is A979 with 1.67 KG

Yes ... eight flanges.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2015, 05:51 AM   #16
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 935
Default

hereby 4 maces from the William Burrell Collection, the middle two, the larger ones are of the same type as het mace in # 1, M2B. around 1550
the outer smaller ones are earlier around 1500 of type M1A.

the second mace, from left to right, is 63cm long, flanges are 9.9cm, weight is 1,274kg.


best,
Jasper
Attached Images
            

Last edited by cornelistromp : 14th June 2015 at 05:22 PM.
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2019, 12:43 PM   #17
Nakampfmesser76
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 6
Default original or not?

It was offered to me, but i'm not sure if original or not...
Nakampfmesser76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2019, 04:16 PM   #18
fernando
Lead Moderator European Armoury
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 7,519
Default

Diego, how can anyone help if you don't post any pictures, as you were already reminded ?
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.