|
21st July 2020, 04:08 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Boulder Creek, CA.
Posts: 202
|
croix fourchée on one side of pommel and bend shield with two points on the bend, on nice little rounded square/oval engraving plates... feels very french, maybe 14th c. same for the quillons? And maybe you get a somewhat long handle for the sword length with a concave bevel like that that early? Just guessing here. Not sure about the blade. Feels off. Perhaps a married piece?
|
21st July 2020, 05:26 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: France
Posts: 174
|
As Helleri said, the shape and the quality of the blade look really off. All the real medieval swords I have seen and handled until now had nice clear and crisp lines, and that wobbly fuller just looks wrong in my opinion.
EDIT : to add, that top knob on the pommel looks really weird (very different from what can be found on some XIVth, XVth century swords). However, that pommel shape, described as type H1 by Oakeshott do exist, and, according to him, was used between 1350 and the first quarter of the XVth century. |
22nd July 2020, 02:13 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
I tend to agree with both of you, my visual impression matches the points you raise.
Isn't that "bottleneck" profile of the grip more appropriate on the longer, "bastard" or hand-and-half hilts, and particularly those from the German lands? The cross and orb symbol is typically German, 16th cent. The fuller at the axis of the blade is quite irregular (not a match to the quality of the hilt) even by the less-than-perfect standards of pre-industrial production cutlery. However, the blade shows signs of age and apparently heavy use too since the edges have the irregularity associated with extensive sharpening, with heavy grinding locally to remove deep notches. The tang button makes me suspicious and only helps cement my suspicion that the sword may be a composite. |
22nd July 2020, 02:16 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Cathey, just out of curiosity what is the point of balance on the blade? Could you please post images showing the tang peening, and the blade-to-crossguard fit?
|
22nd July 2020, 09:26 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: France
Posts: 174
|
I just got an idea, does it looks like something was sawed off the guard ? Or is there even some small irregularities or differences in patina and polish ?
I think it might actually be a kaskara rehilted as a medieval like sword in the XIXth, XXth century. The shape of the blade and of the guard (excluding the sawed off parts, middle langets and flared ends of the quillons), and the fact that the guard is made out of bronze (which isn't unheard of in medieval swords, but is unusual) are consistent with this hypothesis. It would explain the shape and finish of the blade (maybe even the inscription, perhaps Amharic ?) and the general proportions of the sword (guard too short, and weird blade length for an allegedly XIVth century one hander). The pommel, nut, and grip probably are of modern making. |
22nd July 2020, 04:50 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
As to whether this guard is a recycled and altered kaskara crossguard, I'm not a kaskara expert so won't venture a definite opinion. But, in looking at an exhibition catalog (Splendeur des Armes, Paris, 1988) in front of me, there are 2-3 kaskaras but their quillons flare out quite notably, so if sawed off shorter, the ends would still be wider than what we see here. However, I leave it to someone who knows kaskaras to tell if there is enough of a variation in their guards to fit with your suggestion. Interesting! |
|
22nd July 2020, 10:23 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: France
Posts: 174
|
There is some medieval swords with bronze pommel and guard, or bronze pommel and steel guard (even had the chance to take a look at one myself) to benefit from the weight of the bronze and the strenght of the steel, but I've never heard of one where it's the other way around.
Regarding the guard, it could indeed be a newly made element too, but I feel like grinding excess material with a file would be way more easy than making a new guard from scratch (but again, I could be wrong, and it might be a newly made one !) Also see : http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=24259 , especially figure 10 exhibiting similar globus cruciger, but also some guards that could easily be modified into what we got here. |
|
|