![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 528
|
![]()
A fast food philosophy I can only agree upon when shopping for fast food
![]() Correcting all of the bad wiki information might suit me as a paid job but as I participate unpaid on forums dealing with correct information and summations, a Wikipedia (the site) article is the last reference I would ever choose to offer another in a forum discussion. A step above Snopes perhaps. There are a great many times I simply avoid other's inquests and research tips regarding homework and for exactly the result of these types of exchange. Hence a simple shrug. No big deal. ![]() GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
|
![]()
These articles may offer a few starting points for further research about welsh weapons and cultural influences in the early mediaevil period.
http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba47/ba47feat.html http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba40/ba40regs.html I find the Wesh WW1 sword, inspired by the celtic leaf shaped blades, very interesting also. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,249
|
![]()
some interesting links from that original wiki article posted by fearn. there is one referencing the use of the longbow in ww2 by an english commando officer who used it in an ambush of a german patrol and is the only certified longbow 'kill' of the war. he also carried a claymore into battle.
![]() wiki articles can be starting points for research, as long as accompanied by valid and verifiable external references i see no reason that they should not be used as would any other research based on other forms of documents. some of them are pretty crappy tho ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|