![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,056
|
![]()
Not at all like any Madura blade I've ever seen, David, also the cross section is Bugis.Pamor is not Madura in either construction or execution.
I do not know exactly where it is from, but in my experience, not Madura. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
This has to be Terengganu. All parts of it.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
just for comparison.
Last edited by Gustav; 14th March 2010 at 08:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,237
|
![]()
Thank you Alan and Kai Wee for your responses. Terengganu is where i had thought this keris was from, but when Alan expressed that respected people on this subject had suggested to him that this kind of topographic relief pamor is virtually unknown from this area it raised a serious question with me about it's origin. Ultimately where it is from would not effect my liking for this keris, but it is an important piece of information that i would like to have correct about any keris i own if possible.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
File marks seem also to be not unusual, becouse of the resharpening praktice.
Last edited by Gustav; 14th March 2010 at 08:24 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,237
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
As I understand it, in bugis influenced regions some value is put also on the sharpness of the edges, so the blades were sometimes resharpened. I mean, I can see some resharpening (or file) work also on your blade.
Anybody please correct me, if this is wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|