![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I guess you are fliping at least the first paragraph. The matchlock has quite fewer parts. It works on a levering basis; no springs, bearings or tumblers, less friction.
Fernando |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
You're right, Fernando, I did flip that.
For others, aside from the slam gun and similar zip guns, are there any breechloaders that have a similar low number of moving parts? Best, F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]()
The basic matchlock appears to be two moving parts (three with the pan cover) and one spring, though it seems it would be possible to get it to fire even if the spring broke. See http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=7524
Simpler than that and we have the basic serpentine: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=7077 Any simpler than that and I guess we're down to a simple touch-hole. Though in a 19th century setting I guess a percussion nipple&cap and a blunt object could work as well, depending on how much force you get blowing back through the nipple when the main charge goes off. Might make it hard to aim though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|