![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
Thanks Tuan Cedric, but the posture of Durga unveiled seemed somewhat different from what I've seen on Buddhist rupas. Maybe the stance got modified when it came to Southeast Asia?
Image take from: http://thethankahouse.com/postures_pedistals.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris - Bruxelles
Posts: 32
|
![]()
As I said it's also because it is sculptured on a handle. If the posture couls be on a straight line then it would look like your illustration.
Any ways it's not obvious like some others detail or styles. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
Hmmm... You are probably right. Here's a couple more images I got from the net. One was from a previous post here. Aggressive posturing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris - Bruxelles
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Yes definitely. You can see that the posture looks like the Alidha/pratyalidha standing position... But if you look them from the back they look seated and I have not been able to find a seated posture that look like that. You know that all the posture have their meaning (like almost everything in the keris). I find strange that such an important part of the kriss would be sculptured always the same way without a good reason.
I've been through an interesting study about durga http://www.asianart.com/articles/durga/ and as you'll see in the postures the right foot is almost always upper than the left. Is this the model? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|