![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Bump !!!
please .....no one any ideas or comments at all ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]()
The blade and hilt don't seem to match each other very well, so perhaps some form of emergency construction/repair?
The pattern in the steel might perhaps be from folding? Or at leasts some form of extensive hot working with similar purpose. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Kisak
![]() thank you for replying. Having the sword 'in hand' it feels nicely balanced. I believe that the rivetting was done to re-inforce the 'fixing' of the blade, not, as I had originally thought, as a repair /emergency construction. (as you have pointed out). The patina on the blade around the langet area suggests that the hilt and blade have been together for a very long time. The tang of the blade was also 'fixed' with resin....much of which has , through age, has 'dried out' and crumbled. I get the impression that the blade was 'valued' by its owner. The hilt has/had a thick layer of silver ( the deep scoring on the exposed sections of the hilt is original, probably to provide a 'key' to help secure the silver ....and is not due to my 'excessive cleaning' ![]() ![]() I wondered whether this was a 'captured' blade and was hoping the 'square' shaped stamp (in the picture) would provide clues as to its origins. The inlays may have been added afterwards, but I am not certain. All the best David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|