![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]() Quote:
First, Gmar Hatima Tova! I agree with everything you said, and you have mentioned yet additional "pro-Persian" features. But my question is a more general one: we see the hybrid "Otto-Persian" swords now and then, and the preponderance of elements from one culture is often not as pronounced as here. They are truly a melange of styles, which would be not unexpected since the two countries were in close contact both in peace and war, and the swordmakers moved from one to another. Also, some adjacent areas ( Caucasus, for example) were under the influence of both cultures and manufactured weapons of a multitude of styles and sold them both to Turkey and Iran. When ( if ever) did the pure styles started to mix? The existence of the so-called Adjemi Kilic-es and Atesh-Kilic-es ( wavy shamshir blades) in Turkey testifies to the widespread infusion of non-Turkish elements into the Ottoman Empire, and, likely, the reverse was also true ( Pala blades with Persian decorations and high contrast wootz, for example). How do we attribute these melange weapons? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|