Need your help on ID of this chainmail hauberk.

Jim McDougall · 29th July 2009, 05:08 PM

Interesting comments overall, and Nando, you are truly an 'artiste' with words...crescendo, very well put!
I think with collectors, most collections are in varying degree 'in flux', and often pieces have to be 'let go' either to upgrade or as interests digress into other fields. Most individuals must make these choices as typically, most of us do not have the means to acquire items as comprehensively as we would like to. Many become dealers in degree as well, in order to subsidize thier collecting.

With this understanding I think we all agree that buying and selling items is most often a necessary element of collecting.Personally I admire sellers who responsibly try to learn all they can about an item before placing it for sale, and present the description as accurately and detailed as possible.

Returning to the subject at hand, the identification of this chainmail, I will say again that the comments thus far seem to well address the condition of the mail, and I look forward to hearing more on the construction, as Gene has well noted.
It seems I have studied arms and armour most of my life, and the more I think I know, the more I realize how much I dont know

I love to learn and being here in these discussions is by far the greatest joy ever, where the learning never stops.

Perhaps some close up shots will give better look at the construction Dmitry.

Nando, you got it, on the prairie as always it seems, headed west toward El Paso, on the 'low road' (US 10) long drive to Tuscon, then in for 'wagon repairs' then northern Arizona near Flagstaff. The 'Boss' says I gotta thin out the library some here in the bookmobile or we're gonna need new shocks

All the best,
Jim

fernando · 29th July 2009, 06:22 PM

Hi again Jim cowboy,

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim McDougall

Interesting comments overall, and Nando, you are truly an 'artiste' with words...crescendo, very well put!...

Your'e like port whine; you improve with age ...meaning your ever increasing ability to put others on the top of the moon

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim McDougall

Perhaps some close up shots will give better look at the construction Dmitry...

Perhaps, yes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim McDougall

...Nando, you got it, on the prairie as always it seems, headed west toward El Paso, on the 'low road' (US 10) long drive to Tuscon, then in for 'wagon repairs' then northern Arizona near Flagstaff. The 'Boss' says I gotta thin out the library some here in the bookmobile or we're gonna need new shocks

...

You will have to forget for a while that extreme diplomacy of yours and tell the 'Boss' that the worse shock would be thining out the library; that gap couldn't be fixed ... absorvers can

.

Have a nice ride.
Fernando

kronckew · 29th July 2009, 09:13 PM

for reference:

maille is normally made by wrapping a steel wire helically around a hard steel mandril, the wire is then cut in a straight line lengthwise across the top of the mandril with a chisel. for butted, the rings are assembled and the slightly offset ends bent back into place. in the example below, the chisel cut ends are apparent.

for riveted, the ends are further processed by hammering flat, punching a hole in each flat, then using a small triangular sliver to rivet the ends together. indo-persian armour usually uses round rivets. 19c parade armour is usually butted.

Up until the 14th century European mail was made of alternating rows of both riveted rings and solid rings. After that it was almost all made from riveted rings only. Both would have been made using wrought iron. Some later pieces were made of wrought steel with an appreciable carbon content that allowed the piece to be heat treated. Wire for the riveted rings was formed by either of two methods. One was to hammer out wrought iron into plates and cut or slit the plates. These thin pieces were then pulled through a draw-plate repeatedly until the desired diameter was achieved. Waterwheel powered drawing mills are pictured in several period manuscripts. Another method was to simply forge down an iron billet into a rod and then proceed to draw it out into wire. The solid links would have been made by punching from a sheet.[1]

modern maille is usually butted, riveted maille is very expensive due to the hand labour involved, while butted maille can be 'knitted' by machine. butted maille is also sometime found with the butt joint welded electrically. maille can be found nowadays in aluminum (much lighter), stainless steel and galvanised steel, all of which, while rust resistant, do not have the proper 'look'. (just for interest, the maille in lord of the rings was plastic rings, except in closeups)

Mail armour provided an effective defence against slashing blows by an edged weapon and penetration by thrusting and piercing weapons; in fact The Royal Armoury at Leeds concluded that, "...it is almost impossible to penetrate using any conventional medieval weapon..." A good sword blow, arriving in exactly perpendicular angle to surface, could cut through the links; when the mail was not riveted a well placed thrust from a spear or thin sword could penetrate, and a poleaxe or halberd blow could break through the armour, but generally mail provided excellent protection to the soldier. According to a study of skeletons found in Visby, Sweden, a majority of the skeletons showed wounds on less well protected legs.[1]

The flexibility of mail meant that a blow would often injure the wearer, potentially causing serious bruising or fractures, and it was a poor defence against head trauma. Mail-clad warriors typically wore separate rigid, helms over their mail coifs for head protection. Likewise, blunt weapons such as maces could harm the wearer by their impact without penetrating the armour; usually a soft armour, such as gambeson, was worn under the hauberk.[1]

my maille hauberk:

blowup of sleeve:

11mm outside ring dia. 1.65mm thick steel wire, 4 in 1, black oxide finish, greased against rust. a bit dusty.

whole hauberk:

full length sleeves, body length is below the knee.
weighs about 17+ kilos. 20,000 links, give or take a few.
very flexible size wise, fits my 48" chest over a heavy wool tunic, over cotton undies

some of the other bits that go with the hauberk just for the heck of it...

the hauberk overshadowed by it's modern equivalent kevlar body armour.
less coverage, but lighter & a tad more bullet/shrapnel resistant.

notes:
[1] ref:wiki article on maille.

Jim McDougall · 29th July 2009, 09:35 PM

"...the best of mail coats, that covers my heart,
heirloom of Hrethel, and Waylands work, finest of byrnies".
-"Beowulf"

Since I admittedly know absolutely nothing about mail, I could not resist visiting Oakeshott ("The Archaeology of Weapons") from which this quote was taken, and Robinson ("Oriental Armour"). While not adding anything to the identification here, a note in Oakeshott is interesting on the term 'chain mail'; "...there is no such thing as chain mail or chain armor, any more than there can be such a thing as plate mail", (p.90).

Apparantly the chain mail term is yet another term poetically applied in literature of the 18th century in describing arms and armour, and in actuality is best described as a shirt of interlocked rings, or mail (Lat. macula, Fr. mailles=mesh or net).
As noted in Oakeshott, since this term has been widely used colloquially in description, it is much easier to continue its use, I just thought it was interesting.

From most of what I understand, most Eastern mail, that is Persian, Turkish and Indian, of earlier than the beginning of 19th century was rivetted. The mail produced after that was typically for parade armour, as obviously the rivets would add considerable strength to the mail as a unit. This parade mail was of the 'butted' form.
It seems apparant that many mail type armours remained in use for some time, especially in ethnographic regions such as the Sudan. Robinson (p.63) describes these as becoming severely worn out due to means of replacement or competant repairs in the remote regions of the Caucusus and others including the Sudan. This seems puzzling regarding the Sudan as on p.86 he discusses the continued manufacture of mail in the Sudan and Arkell ("The Making of Mail at Omdurman", A.J.Arkell, Kush, Vol.IV, p.83-85, 1956) notes a discussion with a Sudanese ironworker. The old ironworker was able to produce with no difficulty whatsoever a sample shirt and of the 'old cut', but different rings were used that were butted and not rivetted. This would suggest that the old shirts were most likely Ottoman?

In another interesting reference in Robinson (p.85) it was noted that during the Mahdist conflicts, there were mail shirts produced in Birmingham for the Khedive's 'Iron Men' in Egypts forces sent against the Mahdi's Ansar. These were apparantly of split rings which were so brittle that when they were struck by Sudanese bullets, they shattered and resulted in atrocious wounds. When the warriors gathered items from the fallen, they took the helmets, but left the shirts.

As I gathered information to better understand the nature of mail, how it was constructed and how it might have been maintained as servicable, I could find little on what certainly must have been the dread of every knight and warrior, rust. I found that there was at least some evidence of the use of galvanization in India ("Galvanized Indian Mail", Royal Armouries #5, Bottomley and Stallybraces) but apparantly not in Europe, where zinc was not known as an element until the 17th century. I have not yet read this article, but found the title intriguing. I am puzzled by the note on zinc in Europe also as it is I believe used in production of brass from Roman times.

My question is how was rust inhibited on these coats of mail in early times, and how were they kept servicable if they became rusted?

All best regards,
Jim

kronckew · 29th July 2009, 10:02 PM

i recall from somewhere (?) that maille shirts would be put in a barrel with sand and rolled about to clean off rust, they were then oiled. possibly thus varnished with a drying oil that would inhibit rust. i recall olive oil was used by the romans. if used in thin coats, it does dry & form a protective coat.

i also recall reading about the maille used at omdurman being brittle due to age, rust and lack of maintenance.

Atlantia · 29th July 2009, 10:27 PM

Jim,

I'm very interested to hear about 'old' galavised mail?
Do you have any more information? Is it galvanised in the modern sense?
I thought that galvanising was essentially 2nd half 20thC?
Well, in any commercial sense.

As for rust proofing, well, theres the thing isn't it!
A heavy 'coat' will over time wear through movement any thin layer of protection and make patches start to rust again.
However, as can be seen on Kronckews coat, you can almost kill two birds with one stone if you 'oil brown' the steel.
Oil quenching during heat treatment will also apply a semi-flexible rust resistant coating.
I'm not sure how you'd do it with primitive means on such a large coat, you'd have to do it in sections then assemble.

Kronckew.

Have you been cleaning that with 00 wire wool?

Good points, I would also add that ancient hand made 'wire' and wire produced by machine do look very different.
Also, there is butted link 'wire' mail made from commercially produced links. I actually have a small item made from commercial links.
I better go find it and show you. I'm beginning to confuse myself here!

Back in a bit
Gene

Jim McDougall · 29th July 2009, 10:31 PM

Kronckew, we crossed posts. Absolutely excellent and informative post describing construction and great photos. Really like the comparison of the kevlar and the mail also.
Thank you for addressing my question on servicing of mail and the use of the sand and oil is interesting, and really gives an interesting perspective on this topic.

I found some interesting additional information that concerns much earlier detail on European mail, but might add some insight regardless, in 'Warfare in the Middle Ages", Richard Humble, 1989, p.129-130). Here the author notes that the infection that would be caused by rusty mail fragments and sweaty undergarments would create a septic situation with even wounds which would not normally have proven fatal. He discusses the extraction of a bolt from "...amid a vicious tangle of fractured mail rings which must have created a horrific wound".
Also noted was that blunt trauma from direct blows, even when mail remained intact often led to massive and disabling bruising, as the mail still had a certain amount of 'give' that the undergarment could not entirely absorb.

Other discussions we have had some time ago pertained to the effects of heat in the wearing of armour as well, and resulted in some pretty interesting perspective.

Dmitry, I hope you dont mind the digression into the historical aspects here, as it seemed a great opportunity to learn more about mail, as we work at determining more on te identification of your example.

All best regards,
Jim

Gene, just saw your post....I really only just saw that item on galvanized mail, so would be interested to learn more as well on it. Interesting notes on oil applied during manufacture. I wonder if annealing and applying oil while working the metal rings would have added some minimal protection ?

kronckew · 29th July 2009, 10:43 PM

the romans of course, having conquered britain, had access to tin. it was apparently used extensively to tin plate steel and bronze, as well as orichalcum (brass) used in armour, to prevent rust.

The sestertius, a coin worth four asses and dupondius, worth two asses were both struck in orichalcum brass. The as was about the same size as the dupondius but was struck in more or less pure copper, which was much redder than the brass when newly minted.

It is surprising to many modern students of history to find out that the Greeks and Romans could control very precisely the percentage of each different metal that went into their alloys. The fineness or proportion of precious metal in an alloy was most important in commerce and archaeological research has shown that the Romans could control the finess of gold in their coins and ingots to within one percent. This degree of control not only allowed the Romans to closely guard the purity of their gold and silver coins but allowed them to cheat accurately as well!

An alloy of copper and zinc called orichalcum was used a great deal by the Romans. This consisted of eighty percent copper and twenty percent zinc, with small amounts of lead, tin, and other metals and would be called yellow brass today. [1]

p.s. - atlantia, it was not cleaned with wire wool, but the doggies have contributed a lot of hair to the atmosphere here. everything has dog hair on it to some extent.

one adapts...

p.p.s. - chain mail consists of a message that attempts to induce the recipient to make a number of copies of the message and then pass them on to as many recipients as possible

[1] - found on the interweb....

Atlantia · 29th July 2009, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim McDougall

Gene, just saw your post....I really only just saw that item on galvanized mail, so would be interested to learn more as well on it. Interesting notes on oil applied during manufacture. I wonder if annealing and applying oil while working the metal rings would have added some minimal protection ?

Hi mate, Indeed yes, cherry hot steel into oil leaves a slightly flexible coating of oil and carbon. perrrfek!

here are some mail samples.
(sadly none are medieval)

Firstly, dating to early 20thC mail, appears to have been hand assembled, but produced from commercialy made 'wire' links. Note the clean cut edges and completely regular sizes each link is 8mm across.

Second Indian mail made from hand made galvanised wire links, each link is approximately 8mm, note the visible irregularities:

third, Indian mail, some age, hand made from wire links, some variation but quite good quality. approx 10mm links, some heat colouring and signs of oil browning.

Lastly, modern stainless steel welded chainmail. State of the art. Larger link (7mm)

Dmitry · 30th July 2009, 02:56 PM

Wow! Thanks for all the input, gentlemen!
I should've set the email notification of replies.
Will snap some macro photos of the linkage tonight!

Dmitry · 9th August 2009, 02:23 AM

29th July 2009, 09:13 PM	#3
kronckew Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Room 101, Glos. UK Posts: 4,215	for reference: maille is normally made by wrapping a steel wire helically around a hard steel mandril, the wire is then cut in a straight line lengthwise across the top of the mandril with a chisel. for butted, the rings are assembled and the slightly offset ends bent back into place. in the example below, the chisel cut ends are apparent. for riveted, the ends are further processed by hammering flat, punching a hole in each flat, then using a small triangular sliver to rivet the ends together. indo-persian armour usually uses round rivets. 19c parade armour is usually butted. Up until the 14th century European mail was made of alternating rows of both riveted rings and solid rings. After that it was almost all made from riveted rings only. Both would have been made using wrought iron. Some later pieces were made of wrought steel with an appreciable carbon content that allowed the piece to be heat treated. Wire for the riveted rings was formed by either of two methods. One was to hammer out wrought iron into plates and cut or slit the plates. These thin pieces were then pulled through a draw-plate repeatedly until the desired diameter was achieved. Waterwheel powered drawing mills are pictured in several period manuscripts. Another method was to simply forge down an iron billet into a rod and then proceed to draw it out into wire. The solid links would have been made by punching from a sheet.[1] modern maille is usually butted, riveted maille is very expensive due to the hand labour involved, while butted maille can be 'knitted' by machine. butted maille is also sometime found with the butt joint welded electrically. maille can be found nowadays in aluminum (much lighter), stainless steel and galvanised steel, all of which, while rust resistant, do not have the proper 'look'. (just for interest, the maille in lord of the rings was plastic rings, except in closeups) Mail armour provided an effective defence against slashing blows by an edged weapon and penetration by thrusting and piercing weapons; in fact The Royal Armoury at Leeds concluded that, "...it is almost impossible to penetrate using any conventional medieval weapon..." A good sword blow, arriving in exactly perpendicular angle to surface, could cut through the links; when the mail was not riveted a well placed thrust from a spear or thin sword could penetrate, and a poleaxe or halberd blow could break through the armour, but generally mail provided excellent protection to the soldier. According to a study of skeletons found in Visby, Sweden, a majority of the skeletons showed wounds on less well protected legs.[1] The flexibility of mail meant that a blow would often injure the wearer, potentially causing serious bruising or fractures, and it was a poor defence against head trauma. Mail-clad warriors typically wore separate rigid, helms over their mail coifs for head protection. Likewise, blunt weapons such as maces could harm the wearer by their impact without penetrating the armour; usually a soft armour, such as gambeson, was worn under the hauberk.[1] my maille hauberk: blowup of sleeve: 11mm outside ring dia. 1.65mm thick steel wire, 4 in 1, black oxide finish, greased against rust. a bit dusty. whole hauberk: full length sleeves, body length is below the knee. weighs about 17+ kilos. 20,000 links, give or take a few. very flexible size wise, fits my 48" chest over a heavy wool tunic, over cotton undies some of the other bits that go with the hauberk just for the heck of it... the hauberk overshadowed by it's modern equivalent kevlar body armour. less coverage, but lighter & a tad more bullet/shrapnel resistant. notes: [1] ref:wiki article on maille. Last edited by kronckew; 29th July 2009 at 09:26 PM.

29th July 2009, 10:43 PM	#8
kronckew Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Room 101, Glos. UK Posts: 4,215	the romans of course, having conquered britain, had access to tin. it was apparently used extensively to tin plate steel and bronze, as well as orichalcum (brass) used in armour, to prevent rust. The sestertius, a coin worth four asses and dupondius, worth two asses were both struck in orichalcum brass. The as was about the same size as the dupondius but was struck in more or less pure copper, which was much redder than the brass when newly minted. It is surprising to many modern students of history to find out that the Greeks and Romans could control very precisely the percentage of each different metal that went into their alloys. The fineness or proportion of precious metal in an alloy was most important in commerce and archaeological research has shown that the Romans could control the finess of gold in their coins and ingots to within one percent. This degree of control not only allowed the Romans to closely guard the purity of their gold and silver coins but allowed them to cheat accurately as well! An alloy of copper and zinc called orichalcum was used a great deal by the Romans. This consisted of eighty percent copper and twenty percent zinc, with small amounts of lead, tin, and other metals and would be called yellow brass today. [1] p.s. - atlantia, it was not cleaned with wire wool, but the doggies have contributed a lot of hair to the atmosphere here. everything has dog hair on it to some extent. one adapts... p.p.s. - chain mail consists of a message that attempts to induce the recipient to make a number of copies of the message and then pass them on to as many recipients as possible [1] - found on the interweb.... Last edited by kronckew; 29th July 2009 at 11:09 PM.

29th July 2009, 05:08 PM	#1
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,192	Interesting comments overall, and Nando, you are truly an 'artiste' with words...crescendo, very well put! I think with collectors, most collections are in varying degree 'in flux', and often pieces have to be 'let go' either to upgrade or as interests digress into other fields. Most individuals must make these choices as typically, most of us do not have the means to acquire items as comprehensively as we would like to. Many become dealers in degree as well, in order to subsidize thier collecting. With this understanding I think we all agree that buying and selling items is most often a necessary element of collecting.Personally I admire sellers who responsibly try to learn all they can about an item before placing it for sale, and present the description as accurately and detailed as possible. Returning to the subject at hand, the identification of this chainmail, I will say again that the comments thus far seem to well address the condition of the mail, and I look forward to hearing more on the construction, as Gene has well noted. It seems I have studied arms and armour most of my life, and the more I think I know, the more I realize how much I dont know I love to learn and being here in these discussions is by far the greatest joy ever, where the learning never stops. Perhaps some close up shots will give better look at the construction Dmitry. Nando, you got it, on the prairie as always it seems, headed west toward El Paso, on the 'low road' (US 10) long drive to Tuscon, then in for 'wagon repairs' then northern Arizona near Flagstaff. The 'Boss' says I gotta thin out the library some here in the bookmobile or we're gonna need new shocks All the best, Jim

29th July 2009, 09:35 PM	#4
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,192	"...the best of mail coats, that covers my heart, heirloom of Hrethel, and Waylands work, finest of byrnies". -"Beowulf" Since I admittedly know absolutely nothing about mail, I could not resist visiting Oakeshott ("The Archaeology of Weapons") from which this quote was taken, and Robinson ("Oriental Armour"). While not adding anything to the identification here, a note in Oakeshott is interesting on the term 'chain mail'; "...there is no such thing as chain mail or chain armor, any more than there can be such a thing as plate mail", (p.90). Apparantly the chain mail term is yet another term poetically applied in literature of the 18th century in describing arms and armour, and in actuality is best described as a shirt of interlocked rings, or mail (Lat. macula, Fr. mailles=mesh or net). As noted in Oakeshott, since this term has been widely used colloquially in description, it is much easier to continue its use, I just thought it was interesting. From most of what I understand, most Eastern mail, that is Persian, Turkish and Indian, of earlier than the beginning of 19th century was rivetted. The mail produced after that was typically for parade armour, as obviously the rivets would add considerable strength to the mail as a unit. This parade mail was of the 'butted' form. It seems apparant that many mail type armours remained in use for some time, especially in ethnographic regions such as the Sudan. Robinson (p.63) describes these as becoming severely worn out due to means of replacement or competant repairs in the remote regions of the Caucusus and others including the Sudan. This seems puzzling regarding the Sudan as on p.86 he discusses the continued manufacture of mail in the Sudan and Arkell ("The Making of Mail at Omdurman", A.J.Arkell, Kush, Vol.IV, p.83-85, 1956) notes a discussion with a Sudanese ironworker. The old ironworker was able to produce with no difficulty whatsoever a sample shirt and of the 'old cut', but different rings were used that were butted and not rivetted. This would suggest that the old shirts were most likely Ottoman? In another interesting reference in Robinson (p.85) it was noted that during the Mahdist conflicts, there were mail shirts produced in Birmingham for the Khedive's 'Iron Men' in Egypts forces sent against the Mahdi's Ansar. These were apparantly of split rings which were so brittle that when they were struck by Sudanese bullets, they shattered and resulted in atrocious wounds. When the warriors gathered items from the fallen, they took the helmets, but left the shirts. As I gathered information to better understand the nature of mail, how it was constructed and how it might have been maintained as servicable, I could find little on what certainly must have been the dread of every knight and warrior, rust. I found that there was at least some evidence of the use of galvanization in India ("Galvanized Indian Mail", Royal Armouries #5, Bottomley and Stallybraces) but apparantly not in Europe, where zinc was not known as an element until the 17th century. I have not yet read this article, but found the title intriguing. I am puzzled by the note on zinc in Europe also as it is I believe used in production of brass from Roman times. My question is how was rust inhibited on these coats of mail in early times, and how were they kept servicable if they became rusted? All best regards, Jim

29th July 2009, 10:02 PM	#5
kronckew Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Room 101, Glos. UK Posts: 4,215	i recall from somewhere (?) that maille shirts would be put in a barrel with sand and rolled about to clean off rust, they were then oiled. possibly thus varnished with a drying oil that would inhibit rust. i recall olive oil was used by the romans. if used in thin coats, it does dry & form a protective coat. i also recall reading about the maille used at omdurman being brittle due to age, rust and lack of maintenance.

29th July 2009, 10:27 PM	#6
Atlantia Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: The Sharp end Posts: 2,928	Jim, I'm very interested to hear about 'old' galavised mail? Do you have any more information? Is it galvanised in the modern sense? I thought that galvanising was essentially 2nd half 20thC? Well, in any commercial sense. As for rust proofing, well, theres the thing isn't it! A heavy 'coat' will over time wear through movement any thin layer of protection and make patches start to rust again. However, as can be seen on Kronckews coat, you can almost kill two birds with one stone if you 'oil brown' the steel. Oil quenching during heat treatment will also apply a semi-flexible rust resistant coating. I'm not sure how you'd do it with primitive means on such a large coat, you'd have to do it in sections then assemble. Kronckew. Have you been cleaning that with 00 wire wool? Good points, I would also add that ancient hand made 'wire' and wire produced by machine do look very different. Also, there is butted link 'wire' mail made from commercially produced links. I actually have a small item made from commercial links. I better go find it and show you. I'm beginning to confuse myself here! Back in a bit Gene

29th July 2009, 10:31 PM	#7
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,192	Kronckew, we crossed posts. Absolutely excellent and informative post describing construction and great photos. Really like the comparison of the kevlar and the mail also. Thank you for addressing my question on servicing of mail and the use of the sand and oil is interesting, and really gives an interesting perspective on this topic. I found some interesting additional information that concerns much earlier detail on European mail, but might add some insight regardless, in 'Warfare in the Middle Ages", Richard Humble, 1989, p.129-130). Here the author notes that the infection that would be caused by rusty mail fragments and sweaty undergarments would create a septic situation with even wounds which would not normally have proven fatal. He discusses the extraction of a bolt from "...amid a vicious tangle of fractured mail rings which must have created a horrific wound". Also noted was that blunt trauma from direct blows, even when mail remained intact often led to massive and disabling bruising, as the mail still had a certain amount of 'give' that the undergarment could not entirely absorb. Other discussions we have had some time ago pertained to the effects of heat in the wearing of armour as well, and resulted in some pretty interesting perspective. Dmitry, I hope you dont mind the digression into the historical aspects here, as it seemed a great opportunity to learn more about mail, as we work at determining more on te identification of your example. All best regards, Jim Gene, just saw your post....I really only just saw that item on galvanized mail, so would be interested to learn more as well on it. Interesting notes on oil applied during manufacture. I wonder if annealing and applying oil while working the metal rings would have added some minimal protection ?

30th July 2009, 02:56 PM	#10
Dmitry Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 607	Wow! Thanks for all the input, gentlemen! I should've set the email notification of replies. Will snap some macro photos of the linkage tonight!

9th August 2009, 02:23 AM	#11
Dmitry Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 607