![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Michael,
I risk being asking the obvious, or having negleted some of the 'lectures' you already have posted, so forgive me for asking you now the folowing: 1 - Were breech chamber locking bars allways made of iron, or were some other times of wood? 2 - Were chambers allways only loaded with gunpowder, or were they some times loaded also with the projectile? Sorry for my ignorance ![]() Fernando |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gyeongsan, South Korea
Posts: 57
|
![]()
Very interesting thread. Korea had very similar breech loaders, made of bronze, called bulangipo, which were used from the 15th century up into the late 19th century. They came in a variety of sizes.
The pictures here were taken at the Korean Army Museum at the Korea Military Academy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Leningrad
Posts: 355
|
![]()
When I was looked at "A Unique South German Breech Loading Arquebus, ca. 1470-1500" I was confused by one interesring detail. The part of the shape wich in red ring looks too futuristic for Ghiberti Lorenzo death-date. It is similar with element of shape of arquebuses from Zeugbuch Kaiser Maximilians I (1502).
Else one interesting detail - It seems that earlier here there was a lever for opening which has been lost later |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Very keen observations, Alexander!
![]() ![]() Best wishes, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Leningrad
Posts: 355
|
![]()
What do you thing about dating of this barrel? Maby the notebook of Ghiberti Lorenzo was added later by another author?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]() Quote:
As I have tried to point out occasionally in former threads, any substantial dating of an object of arts and crafts should not be confined to only one criterion but should instead be based on as many criteria as possible, the latest (= 'youngest') of which would then denote ideally the correct date. The figured and moulded staging which you rightly observed on the stocks of the Maximilian arquebuses in Jörg Kölderer's watercolors of the Maximilian Armories (generally dated to ca. 1507) is actually a very common Late Gothic ornament found on many objects from the 14th throughout the 18th century, comprising such different fields as architectural columns, bronze mortars, furniture, book bindings, etc. It is, of course, also found on various kinds of weapons. What I want to say is: the simple presence of this widely used decorative element alone does not account for any close dating of this object. In the case of the breech loading arquebus other features like the staging and characteristic muzzle section of the barrel and the overall impression it conveys show in their synopsis that this is clearly a product of the second half of the 15th century and can most probably be narrowed down to ca. 1470, +/- ca. 10 years. Best, ![]() Michael |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|