![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, Jim is entirerly correct. The double blade in this format would hinder penetration, and unless razor sharp in the inside, would 'bunch up' material inbetween the blades. So saying, a stab would doesn't need to be up to the hilt to cause problems of course, and I don't see this as a weapon meant to kill, more a secondary weapon for disabling or wounding. I imagine that it would be good for slashing, well raking, as the cuts would be very unlikely to follow the same track continually, rather drawing two ragged cuts probobly very close, at some points parallel, some overlapping, other places falling into sync and cutting deeper. Thing about two parallel cuts close together is that they are very hard to stitch. Often its simply not possible. This may mean that a light/moderate wound might keep a fighter from returning to battle, or a wound might be more likely to infect etc. Also, even stabbing would produce horrible wounds which would be difficult to treat, and would cause similar problems. Just some thounght, I've never seen a paper on how these were used in battle or even their style of use. Gene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|