![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]()
Hi ganjawulung,
nice to see you here. I thought you gonna comment on my keris, but you're starting another interesting topic here. Alan, thanks for your explanation about Pak Suparman. I never knew he was worked for 'sadinoe' the shoe maker. I'm wearing one of 'sadinoe' shoe right now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
The greneng part, IMHO, was not well executed. For comparison, I am sharing with you these pictures of one Solonese or Surakartan nom-noman keris and your keris' sor-soran part (sorry, copying your pic...) GANJAWULUNG |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
GANJAWULUNG |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
beautiful keris you have there. I'd like to see it some day. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,053
|
![]()
Yes!!
The ricikan assigned to each blade form were not assigned in a haphazard manner, nor were they assigned for artistic reasons. They were assigned to convey a meaning and for an esoteric purpose. Vary those ricikan in even the slightest degree and the keris has lost its esoteric value, and hence its meaning. If it has lost its meaning it follows that it has lost its name. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
GANJAWULUNG |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]()
I have too a Pasopati in my home (but without rondonunut).Imo it's another good keris with two color (largansir and ...
![]() I'll do a pic of this...when i'll come back home from indonesia |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
I have in my possession a copy of the Pakem that was prepared by Ngabei Sawikromo for Pakubuwana IX, completed in 1792 (Jawa). PB IX reigned from 1831 to 1893. This earlier Surakarta Pakem defines a dhapur pasopati as having a ron dha nunut. I'm now understand that the book 'dhapur' is simply determine the pakem in PB X era and for the keris before PB X era, it has different ricikan. Then back to my keris, it also might be made with the guidance of pakem before PB X era. by adding ron dha nunut. I'm still wondering about its age, but I guess that I've been miss understood again. poor me. ' price never lies' I bought it cheap and hope the best tangguh for it. ( old PB keris) what a fool. I never expect my thread would result this long debate about pakem dan ricikan. but I do enjoy this thread. I gain so much knowledge and information from both of you. please forgive me for my short comments. I find it difficult to express my thought in English. Y Pak Ganjawulung, I'm wondering why you did not give any comment on my keris age. do you afraid of hurting my feeling when you gonna say "you've been tricked again by the keris dealer" . You know well that I really dont care about it. I do have a new strategy dealing with keris dealers. So don't you worry about it. I'm now collecting keris directly from its source. I simply collect keris from people whom keris are not threated well. people who do not apreciated keris as it should be. people who do not want to keep keris in their house. Off course with the help of my dearest mother. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|