![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
|
![]()
From the Nepali perspective, there seems to be the thought (in Nepal) that it originated in India, and made its way into Nepal in the early 14th century, and it is classified as a Hindu sacrificial blade and weapon.
It is intersting that the Khunda is not commonly found in the Villages of Nepal. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
What about the Tibetan Kora?
Tibetans stem from the Mongoloid culture; did they also get their Kora from Hinduist India? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 373
|
![]()
Hello Ariel,
Are you referring to Sacrificial khunda? I must confess to never having come across Kora/Khunda from Tibet, only small swords and daggers, but Tibet is not my forte. It would seem odd to have a Hindu weapon/sacrificial blade in use, in a Buddist country? Tibetans are not just of Mongol origin btw. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nothern Mexico
Posts: 458
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Also, the kora is a weapon seem to be used in old times by the superior warrior castes, and not likely a villager tool. But the khukri is both things. I think that the kora was a relevant weapon before the introduction of fireweapons in Nepal, but not after. The kora seems not to be a practical weapon to carry with a musket or rifle; I donīt have a very precise information about, and if I am wrong please correct me, but I have the impression that the kora was carried without sheat. And their price must be too high for the common soldier, which can instead carry the khukri from home. This is not a simple matter of personal preferences, I believe. Regards Gonzalo |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|