Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 3rd May 2009, 07:05 PM   #6
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

Teodor/Ariel,
Your comments certainly have good merit, i.e. if the blade is legible dated, it only makes sense to accept it as a fact.
My 'system' places more emphasis on quality, condition and material. The older fittings I observed tend to show more wear-and-tear signs, especially on fittings made of thinner silver, such as in our case, and this is a reason I put late 19th Century on it. I think extra 70-80 years would have add more 'wrinkles' on the relatively thin silver fittings! The older blade could as well be re-fitted. As for place of origin - I actually thought them to be Balkan as well, but most literature calls them "Turkish", and as it's the same empire - it's a tough call:-)
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.