![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
I believe that if you look at the lion on that piece it has been engraved inferring that it was a local copy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Ward, I thought that, but the '1' and crown look stamped. Any significance to this disparity? I mean was it a period 'pattern part' made inside India with a QC mark added by the colonial masters? Regards Gene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
Yes that #1 is a stamp. Smaller stamps are easier to make. I actually prefer the native copies many of them show real art work. If you want to make sure pull the lock and look at the workings. I have a broomhandle mauser that was made in the afghan/pakistan area that is right down to the dimensions and markings. The reason I suspected something strange about it was there were no serial numbers. When I looked under a loop I realized that the lettering was all engraved
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|