![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
The end of that blade has been reshaped. European blade probally English.
Are there any markings on the blade close to the crossguard ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,480
|
![]()
I forgot to note Trenchwarfares assessment had also been for Spanish colonial. Its always frustrating when subsequent posts dont acknowledge same, except obviously in cross posts. It gives the impression previous comments or posts are not being read.
Trench plz excuse the oversight ![]() All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 28
|
![]()
There appears to be a serial number (8204, I think it was) on one side of the crossguard, and 1903 on the other. I don't know if that's a date, but I rather doubt it. Otherwise, COMPLETELY devoid of markings. I like bayos and guns because I can hold up a barely-legible maker mark and go "See! It's factory-made to a pattern!" rather than this guesswork based on components and styles. Hey, y'never know. I'm starting to run out of gun-stuff to memorize, maybe this will be my next time-and-wallet soak.
Unfortunately, in retrospect, I kinda failed at that auction. I knew there were a variety of likely Phillipino blades, but all I bid on was this sword (a whim) and the Cav Sabre, which I was fairly sure of. Like I said, I specialize more in bayos and rifles. I shoulda stuck my card up for the sabre marked En Treue Fest, since I knew what that was and it topped out at a hundred fifty, but I had that strange conflict you sometimes get at shows and auctions where you have lots more disposable money than usual, but bid even more sparingly than usual. Also, I got to the auction late and didn't preview, so I was bidding seat-of-the-pants from the fifth row back based on what I could see. In case anybody wants to berate me for what I passed up, or infer provenance from other pieces, the preview images are still up from the auctionhouse as of 3/29: http://www.auctionzip.com/cgi-bin/ph...zip=13439&kwd= Thanks for all the help. It's not a Cossack Shaska or a Turkish officer sabre, but it's neat enough to have for what I paid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
could you give a closup pic of the 1903 mark
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,480
|
![]()
Hey Vaarok, I think its a pretty neat piece! and know what you mean....once upon a time I thought it was great to match a piece to a picture in a book and say, yup thats it!.
Then the bug got me, and now its all about detective work.....sleep is between mysteries, books are stashed all over, the addiction is overwhelming ! ![]() I'm glad you posted it, first one like it I've seen. Thanks very much, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 28
|
![]() ![]() As requested. Nothing too special, just a 1903 on the crossguard. Serial (?) on the other side is the same exact font and actually also reads 1903, though it's hard to make out through the rust. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,480
|
![]() Quote:
All best regards, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|