![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
|
![]()
Those could be hard to date, but I think +/- 1900 should be correct.
Look at those currently on auction at Hermann Historica: http://www.hermann-historica.de/aukt...db=kat57_a.txt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 222
|
![]()
Neat, weights seem very similar to this one I posted a while ago:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...manrikigursari |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
Interesting hybrid between a chain whip and a manriki-gusari (or perhaps a chain spear?).
The classical chain whip has links about the size of the end darts, and it moves like a chain. The kusari has a lighter chain with heavier heads, and it moves like a flail. This one is in between, because those links appear light enough that this weapon will move like a kusari, but the joints have so many corners that (I'm guessing) it would really hurt to use the traditional wrapping motions (say around your arm or leg) to redirect its motion. Kusaris and chain whips usually have fairly smooth links, just to protect the wielder. In any case, I'd guess early 20th century, or late 19th century. This was the golden age of Chinese martial arts, and a number of more exotic weapons showed up then. F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
Several knowledgeable people have been given me a date of 1900-1920, so I think it should be relatively accurate.
In use, the chain can wrap under the arms without a problem. It is too short to use the legs in wrapping. I have now seen six or seven with almost exactly the same weights, so I think this was a standard form for the time. I think the chains on many have been replaced, but mine appears to be original. Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|