![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]()
Looking at the surface of this keris. wanderfull
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]()
Hi Michael,
a real beauty! My guess is also that it is a talismanic insert or an old repair from an blowhole. ![]() Congrats for this very nice keris, sajen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Holland
Posts: 245
|
![]()
Hi Michael,
Nice one ! The blade is very wel conserved. Maybe the ''insert'' is something like a tambal , a piece of a older or family blade? I.m just shouting something but this is what was on my mind ![]() Danny |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,228
|
![]()
Michael,
Very nice keris. Can you see the tang / ie. is the handle removable ? Best regards Willem |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Thanks all,
Any other ideas? Willem, the sturdy tang is visible when I remove the hilt. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Hi Michael,
Sorry for not updating you on this piece, earlier. When I showed pics of this blade to friends whom attended the keris seminar and workshop @ Universiti Malaya (UM), there's no clear indication.. what was confirmed was that it's a malela blade, the dressing is typical Terengganu-styled. From the blade material, it is not too old, no earlier than 20thC works, probably later.. Unfortunately, many were unwilling to give an opinion based on pictures alone.. as other aspects are not being abled to be determined. ![]() Shahrial Last edited by Alam Shah; 18th March 2009 at 11:07 AM. Reason: grammar |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
|
![]()
Michael, I noted this thread a few weeks ago, but at the time was in a situation where I could not post to the Forum.
It is difficult to give an iron-clad opinion based on a photo, but what immediately catches my eye is the apparent flaw in the opposite side of the blade to the side with the inset. This flaw appears to correspond in position to the area with the inset. From what I can see here, I'm inclined to think this inset is a repair intended to strengthen the flawed area. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|