|
|
|
29th January 2009, 07:52 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
I agree with RSWORD. This is typical sham pattern. Some still debate sham's attribution to wootz, but it has not been officially declared as non-wootz. The inferiority of sham comparing to other more prominent patterns is another topic, but generally speaking - sham wootz is still wootz
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
