![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
...sorry for the confusion David - I posted the D.Peres image to illustrate that the tang usually has a hole - it's not the blade in question but a previous post.
Last edited by stephen wood; 26th January 2009 at 01:05 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Stephen,
if I had looked 'properly' at the original pictures....I would have realised the D.Peres sword picture was not of the original posted ![]() The fuller is as wide as the rather short tang with little or no shoulder, also, the tang seems as 'thick' as the remaining metal's 'thickness' between the fullers.....seems 'weak' to me....and probably not to the original sword's spec. (assuming this was a functional weapon, and not ceremonial/talismatic or a tourist piece)The tang looks like its formed from 'stock removal' rather than forged. Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
...thanks David. What is "stock removal"?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Stephen,
stock removal is the shaping of the part by the removal of metal (filing, grinding) to create the object /shape. The tang does not look 'forged to shape' on this blade ....but the pictures are not that good. Usually with such a short tang and no rivet holes I would have thought this was 'resin' set into a hilt Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
This image shows how a blade with such an unpierced tang is fixed into the hilt.
It is a "thuluth" kaskara - note how wide and flat the blade is and the characteristic "rounded" pommel. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
I want my own X-Ray machine ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|