![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Preserved at the City museum of Cologne, Germany.
In the first picture, the bow is of course inversed; this had been corrected by the time the second picture was taken. The open curve of the composite bow is due to not having had a string attached for hundreds of years. The detached bow of a huge wall crossbow also at the Cologne museum. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
The wooden core is covered with pig skin, the mouth of the quiver is leather covered, the original leather lid is now missing on almost all surviving samples.
Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
One more detail.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Two line drawings, after 1505, from Martin Löffelholz's Nuremberg scrapbook started in 1505. They picture devices to cut slightly curved grooves into cossbow quarrel hafts for insetting wooden or leather flights/fletches to give them a more accurate ballistic spin as they went.
500 year old machine based mass production. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
The first dated 1460, made for Duke Ulrich V of Württemberg, Southern Germany.
Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
The rest.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
A fine Late Gothic crossbow, 1st half 15th century, and two fine 15th century century quivers, all from the former armory of Schloss Hohenaschau, Upper Bavaria, now preserved at the Bavarian National Museum Munich.
Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 12
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
|
![]()
Hello together!
It has been a while since I posted the last time! I have been to Nuremberg and I took the promised pictures of the crossbows exposed in the "Germanisches Nationalmuseum". The first crossbow was made in about 1475. The bow seems to be strong (500kg of drawweight is possible). Therefore I was quite astonished that the trigger is so short, even though the lock is a one-axle lock mechanism. How is it possible to pull the trigger without much effort? It must be much easyer to pull the long trigger of a 14th or early 15th century crossbow with a weaker prod, so were the crossbowmakers during the late 15th century able to construct more efficient one axle-lock mechanisms than before? The second late 15th century crossbow is the one with the obsolete stong reflex horn and sinew prod and the weird trigger. I have had an exact look at it and it seems to me that the bow and the trigger were not originaly attached to the stock. The prod seems to be to broad for the stock and the belly is too round to fit exactelly. A bow with theses dimensions must have a draw weight of much more than 500kgs, but the stock seems to be very thin and fragile (much thinner than the stock of the first crossbow). The stock has several quite dark horn inlays that look simular to the inlays shown in "Die Hornbogenarmbrust" (Abb. 91). The only inlay with a different colour is on the lower side where the unusual trigger is located. I have the impression that the original horn inlay was removed in order to fit in the seccond trigger. What do you think? Best wishes, David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
|
![]()
I´m sorry... something with reducing the sice of the pictures didn´t work! I will post the pictures as soon as I have a soluion!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() fernando@vikingsword.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
|
![]()
pictures...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
|
![]()
more pictures...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
|
![]()
more pictures...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
|
![]()
Thanks for your offer Fernando!
I have installed a suitable program, so I was able to reduce the sice of the pictures by myself! But I can send you some of the unreduced pictures if you want! The problem is that I can only send five pictures with one email! best wishes, David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Great pictures, David.
No need to email them to me. Appreciating these ones is quite satisfactory ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|