![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Your wish is my command
![]() I must admit that the picture is not taken from my weapon but from an auction on ebay. But the guard is identical to mine. The knights helmet and the glove are signs for knighthood and valour (a reminder to fight bravely and with honour during a duel). The so called fasces are a reminiscence to the Romans and related to the French revolution (many are stronger than one alone). The leaves on the one side are olive tree, reminders of the olympic idea (sport aspect) the other ones are oak which might point to the fencer wielding the blade to be hard and endurable. If someon knows the meaning of the fasces with the protuding hand, please let me know. Greetz William Last edited by William V.; 4th December 2008 at 05:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
![]() Quote:
Cheers Chris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
HEUREKA! Finally at least a small path to follow to the light of knowledge
![]() @katana: The blade of your foil was most probably forged by a company named Cooper-Goodman. They produced the Chassepot bayonet (which was used between 1866-1874 by France but found many other countries copying it)... Check out this link (you can see the similar marking clearly): http://www.old-smithy.info/bayonets/1866_chassepot.htm This information might give a rough idea when the foil might be produced. If one takes into account that the firm might not be active for a long time, and might not have much experience with fencing weapons (referring to the strange POB), this could indicate that the foil may be quite rare.... ![]() So far for now. I hope someone can carry on the torch and finds more information on the firm itself. William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]() Quote:
Well done and thank you William ![]() ![]() hopefully with this new 'lead' I can get find more information. Nice epee (that you posted) certainly has a more business-like blade. ![]() Kind Regards David |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
A pleasure
![]() but could you please post a picture of the tip? I'm interested how it was shaped... William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi William,
it seems "Cooper and Goodman" made firearms..and seem to have been based in Birmingham..found this... "......Mr. Goodman’s connection with the gun trade was of long standing. In 1838, when in the employ of the Scholefields, he entered into partnership with Mr. J.R. Cooper, and subsequently with that gentleman’s brother, Mr. Charles Cooper, the business being carried on at first under the name of J.R. Cooper and Co., and afterwards under that of Cooper and Goodman, until 1888....." http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:Y...lnk&cd=1&gl=uk So on that basis the blade was presumably manufactured , at the latest 1888 Here on this page , Lot 869 http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:b...lnk&cd=2&gl=uk "An UNUSUAL .500 Cal. double barrelled Medium Game Rifle by Cooper and Goodman" and half way down on this page... http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:n...lnk&cd=1&gl=uk "A fine and rare 1856 Pattern rifled service pistol, 25.5cm sighted barrel fitted with rear leaf sights, border engraved lock stamped "1858" over "TOWER" and with a Crown over "VR" at the tail, full stock stamped "WD" and "COOPER & GOODMAN", After hours of searching ....I'm all googled out ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() William will post a picture of the 'point' soon Kind regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Bad news...
I got in touch with a fellow blade collector who said, that the information on the "crown above c.g" needs to be updated... The crown is not in style of the era for the UK, additionally it is a fact that Cooper and Goodman always marked without a crown. He suspects the marking to have belgian origins. Sorry, to says so: but we have to start anew.... ![]() William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|