![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() I've checked the information I have gathered so far and must admit that I've never came across that kind of marking. Quite interesting is the fact that the marking is on the "shoulder" of the blade and not on the side, because normally blades were marked there. Judging by the crown, I would guess the blade was forged in England perhaps first half of the 19th century. The strange grip and the observations made by broadaxe seem to indicate that the weapon was made up at a later point in time using (at least) an older blade (perhaps even the guard). Do you mind posting pictures of the pommel? This might show if the blade is threaded (which can be another indicator for the forging time). William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Broadaxe,
thank you ![]() Hi William, thank you for your time in trying to ID the blade marks...very kind of you ![]() ![]() ![]() The tang of the blade appears to be 'peened' over......whether the pommel is threaded and the tang peened to secure it (prevent it turning) is unclear. What is clear is the fact that pommel and tang were 'mated' sometime ago .All the fittings are nice and tight so it is impossible to gain any more information.....without damage that is ![]() Kind Regards David . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Fernando |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() The pommel looks like the blade is not threaded. This would indicate that the weapon is authentic. So we must get back to Broadaxe' first guess about it being a private ordered weapon. Perhaps the personal whims of a fencer were taken into account while designing the weapon. The POB and the strange grip would indicate something like that. Regarding the blade... I got something, but I want to verify it first... this might take some time. Regarding the sharp point: I wouldn't be too sure that it was in fact used as a duelling weapon. It was not unheard of the sharpening of foils, but the chances are quite slim to get one nowadays which has survived the tides of time. So statistically: it must be sharpened later ![]() William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
![]()
Hi William.
Quote:
Cheers Chris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
@ Chris:
I'm getting goosebumps thinking of some "professional" sharpening an old weapon... ![]() Having two older beauties which were ground down to get a sharp point, my heart is breaking every time I see them ![]() One is a "training weapon" for duels with a Klingenthal blade (around 1895), with the guard of o duelling weapon which used to have a flattened tip. Nevertheless a wonderful piece, but... not original any more... The sharping was done quite professional, I just found out when I checked the length of the weapon and compared it with other weapons. I've attached two pics. Coming back to the foil: perhaps the grooves on the grip were made to provide a grip for some kind of leather-wire binding ![]() this would keep the wire in it's place. All the best William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
![]()
Hi William,
A very beautiful foil - Thanks for sharing. Cheers Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|