Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24th October 2008, 06:51 PM   #1
Bill M
Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
Default

Great Pictures! Thanks for posting them!

Too bad part of the pommel is broken off. But a nice kris anyway.
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th October 2008, 07:00 PM   #2
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
Question

First picture .
Is that a Sniper's rifle from the Civil War ?
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th October 2008, 07:57 PM   #3
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
Default

Thanks for sharing. Some very interesting stuff!
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th October 2008, 11:08 PM   #4
Bill M
Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick
First picture .
Is that a Sniper's rifle from the Civil War ?

The period is right. It is not an Enfield. Looks like a Whitworth or a Baker. Could be a Civil War sniper. Sight tube is a little smaller diameter than usual. I'd love to have one.

I am looking at buying a Civil War sniper rifle that weighs 35 pounds. This is much heavier than an average target/sniper rifle.

One of the problems with the sight tubes was in that recoil in a light weight rifle would often give the guy sighting down the tube, a black eye. The heavier guns had less recoil, but were, of course harder to carry.

Black powder had a limit of how fast it could push a bullet. Smokeless was superior in pushing bullets faster and also did not give away the sniper's position.

Prone snipers using black powder would fire and roll away from the smoke because the other side would open fire at the smoke cloud, hoping to get lucky.
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2008, 12:07 AM   #5
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
Smile

And the Whitworth weighed only eight pounds .
I'm sure the scope added some weight, but what a difference !
I don't believe this is one though .
http://johno.myiglou.com/whitworth.htm
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2008, 05:31 PM   #6
migueldiaz
Member
 
migueldiaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
Default

Hi Bill, Rick, & Charles,

With regard to that sniper rifle, below is the pic of the description (sorry for the blurry photo) -- it's a .44 caliber Morgan James target rifle.

The description reads:

Morgan James Target Rifle,
Caliber .44

Cadet military training included familiarity with the most modern equipment and designs. Therefore, in January 1860, Lt. Holabird, Adjutant of the U.S. Military Academy, wrote to Morgan James of Utica, N.Y., and ordered this rifle fully equipped with telescope sight and loading tool for $95.00.

The original order states, "It may be well to remark that this gun of yours is to be placed in the Model and Small Arms Room (today known as the West Point Museum) at the Military Academy as a specimen of the Improved American Rifle, and also to be fired in comparison with others of different designs and principals."

Muzzleloading rifles of this type were intended to be civilian target arms, but many were used during the Civil War by sharpshooters for long range sniping. As an example of their accuracy, a full-size facsimile of a target shot by Morgan James in 1859 is shown here. He fired using a rest to support the rifle at a distance of 220 yards. The shot outside the circle was the sighting shot, after which he adjusted the telescope and fired nine shots.


I also found this photo I took of a Bristish-American musket, as well as a series of photos on the Brewster-Heller body armor.

This post is off-topic, and am just posting it just the same in view of the queries on the sniper rifle.

Thank you.
Attached Images
        
migueldiaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2008, 07:17 PM   #7
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
Default

WWI experimental armour, nice piece.

I love the barong way above.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2008, 07:21 PM   #8
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
Cool

Thanks Miguel !

Now that I've changed the subject; I'd like to go back to the kris pictured early on in this thread .
Let's look at it carefully; it was 'captured in battle'; kept by the Military ever since ................. and guess what ?

Wait for it .
.
.
.
.
.
.

It is etched !!
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2008, 08:01 PM   #9
Spunjer
Member
 
Spunjer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
Default

lol, who among here was the curator for that museum at one time?
Spunjer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.