![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,216
|
![]()
i lost that one by a pound, the blade was what i was after, the handle someone had commented on as being a burmese parasol handle. ah, well, wasn't going to risk more especially when the postage from germany was not mentioned. i had visions of putting a more culturally correct grip on it.
the laminations look more like just straight laminated steel, not hairpins. nice blade, whoever put the parasol handle on it was in an altered state at the time...i initially thought it was a large bread knife ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Micheal,
thanks again for your insight ![]() Quote:
Hi Kronckew, 'great minds'... and all that. I too was thinking the same ...the only slight problem I had with the blade was, it looked to be 'overly cleaned'. The postage was £14 .... not overly expensive. I was thinking of removing the handle and selling it, I'm sure a parasol collector (strange what some people collect ![]() ![]() I wasn't convinced of the Klewang 'connection', but felt certain it was of SEA origins. The 'parasol' handle was stated as Burmese, whether the handle was fitted recently, to sell or was part of its legitimate history is a mystery....but feel its overall shape would not provide a good 'grip' for the wielder. Kind Regards David |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
The blade looks nice, but I don't see the hairpin folds in it. I have seen a similar blade from Aceh with definite hairpin folds that I wanted quite badly, but the price was too high for me. I have often wondered about it though. The Acenese blade shape is quite reminiscent of Tibetan things, and I have wondered if it does not represent an early form that died out in other regions leaving a few isolated spots like Aceh and Tibet with the older style.
Still it seems convergent evolution is a more parsimonious explanation. Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|