![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
![]()
Flavio, It' different but the pics don't tell the whole story, at least for me.
First you have to figure what was original to the sword & I would guess nothing. The scabbard is top grade but I doubt it's very close to be as old as the sword. It looks to me as Bugis/Malay. I'm not sure about the blade itself. Could it be that it was over-cleaned with some sort of acid or chemicals? The stirrup & metal rings look fairly new. If someone carried that sword everyday they would be dented/scraped. Surprised there is not more opinions on the hilt pommel. I don't think it's horn, but I don't know what type of Ivory. Some sort of tooth? It looks like it broke, was repaired & filled; then stained to make the repairs less noticed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Thank you Bill! For sure the pommel was restored, there is some kind of putty... What I'd like to know is if also the rest of the handle is restored/replaced since a handle of horn is very strange for an "original" moro, but if it was from another place than could be original.... Anyway the collar around the pommel shows some losses, I will post some pics.
Thanks FLavio |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
I know nothing about these blades or even the scabbard timber origins but looking at the Schreger angles the pommel is 100% Elephant ivory definatly not mamooth or any form of sea tooth..
Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|