Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28th September 2008, 09:48 AM   #1
stekemest
Member
 
stekemest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
Default

The pictures are upside down.
stekemest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2008, 11:39 AM   #2
Maskell
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 38
Default

Greetings,

Yes, the image is upside down. After standing on my head for awhile I come up with "NOSHU (NO) JU KANEZANE SAKU KORE" which means KANEZANE (sword smiths name) a resident of NOSHU (MINO or present day GIFU providence) SAKU KORE (made this). The small stamp is what's known as a SHOWA stamp meaning it was made 1926 or later, till the end of the SHOWA era. This sword is likely made during WWII. The large stamp is called a KOKUIN, a counter mark with the kanji "Zane" in the center that we Americans call a turtle stamp. The red paint on the other side are assemblay numbers, worn but may be 26? He is listed as making Showato (machine made) and medium grade Gendaito (hand forged) blades. The formal style of kanji would indicate it is a Gendaito.

To have a proper habaki made is expensive and you will be extremely lucky to find one that fits exactly. Hope this is of some help.

Maskell
Jerry
Maskell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2008, 02:59 PM   #3
celtan
Member
 
celtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
Default

Thank you very much guys,

What do you know? So it was upside down! : )

Henk,Yep, it's in bad condition. I bought it just to rescue same from its owner. So far, I have only cleansed it with penetrating oil, the rust was awful, including some pitting.
Ernest, I'm trying to buy a period tsuba/tsuka et al, but the proper polish is simply out of the question. At least, it will be better than it was...
Jerry, your answer was very much appreciated, learned something new today. and it gives the blade more "personality".

Best regards

Manolo
celtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2008, 11:21 PM   #4
celtan
Member
 
celtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
Default

Hi Guys,

Got me a WWII Tsuba with all the trimmings. No habaki yet. I'm considering taking an alginate impression of the ricasso, making a stone-resin cat of the blade, and send same to have a habaki done.

Regarding the tsuba. Surprise!

It doesn't fit (but I won't yet quit).

Is there any manner in which I may open the tsuba, without destroying the wrappings, so I may adapt same to the tang?

Best

Manolo

BTW: Got me a couple more NCO swords, haven't had yet the time to clean them, so no pics just yet...
celtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2008, 02:20 AM   #5
Rich
Member
 
Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
Default

You might be interested in knowing about this smith. Check my webpage at:

http://www.geocities.com/alchemyst/kanezane.htm

Since this is a gunto (WW II military), I wouldn't be surprised if finding a
habaki would be fairly easy as the blades had to be within military specs.
Might try David MacDonald at:

http://www.montanairon.com/swords.html

Rich S
Rich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2008, 07:30 PM   #6
kisak
Member
 
kisak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by celtan
Is there any manner in which I may open the tsuba, without destroying the wrappings, so I may adapt same to the tang?
Are you confusing tsuba (guard) with tsuka (grip) here? And to the best of my knowledge the grip isn't considered "disassemle-able". The only part of grips I've heard of getting re-used are the metal parts (fuchi, kashira, menuki).

http://home.earthlink.net/~steinrl/glossary.htm
kisak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008, 01:04 AM   #7
celtan
Member
 
celtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
Default

Yep again. Tsuka it its. I bow to your knowledge, O' Kisak-san!.



I believed the same was comprised of two wood halves held together by the combination of kabuto-gane, the ito, same, mekugi, and the fuchi..

So, how did they fit tsubas to the tang? Did they begin with the wood, and once finished , they did the sane-giso and the ito?

And what is more important. How can I adapt a tsuka to the daito's tang without damaging the latter?

Ooopsies! Sorry again, I meant nagako...

: )

M


Quote:
Originally Posted by kisak
Are you confusing tsuba (guard) with tsuka (grip) here?
And to the best of my knowledge the grip isn't considered "disassemle-able". The only part of grips I've heard of getting re-used are the metal parts (fuchi, kashira, menuki).

http://home.earthlink.net/~steinrl/glossary.htm

Last edited by celtan; 26th November 2008 at 01:19 AM.
celtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008, 01:07 AM   #8
celtan
Member
 
celtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
Default

Hey! Nice link, kisak. Thanks!

Best

M
celtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008, 10:50 AM   #9
kisak
Member
 
kisak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by celtan
So, how did they fit tsubas to the tang? Did they begin with the wood, and once finished , they did the sane-giso and the ito?

And what is more important. How can I adapt a tsuka to the daito's tang without damaging the latter?
From what I've understood, traditionally the wooden grip core parts are carved to fit the tang of a specific sword. When well made, the sword is supposed to be held in the grip by friction, with the mekugi pin being there to help push the sword into the grip, and as a safety feature. Once the grip core has been carved, the two halves of it are glued together, and then all the wrappings and so are done.

I'm not sure how the cast-metal hilts on some WW2-era swords were fitted, but as these would most likely be mated to machine made blades, I guess more uniform tang dimensions, coupled with the fact that the demands on overall quality there seems to have been rather low, could have meant that they could just make these to a certain size and have that fit well enough.

Of course, as many WW2-era swords took considerable shortcuts every here and there, they might have cheated a bit here too. Large amounts of washers (seppa) between grip and tsuba, and between the tsuba and habaki, could indicate that things weren't fitted properly.

I've heard that one thing done by some modern day makers of reproduction katana use rip cores with slightly undersized slots for the tang, and then simply force them on so the wood is compressed, and a suitably sized slot created. Of course, this can make it near impossible to disassemble the sword, and risks cracks and other defects in the grip core.

As for adapting the tsuka from one sword to the tang of another, I'm not sure of this is really done at all, at least not on "real" swords such as this one (the machine made ones with cast grips possibly being another matter). Altering the shape of the tang is as far as I can tell a pretty big no-no under most circumstances, and if you're unwrapping the grip, splitting the core, reshaping the slot (assuming this is even possible), and then reassembling everything (most likely needing new cord to wrap with), then getting an entirely new tsuka made probably isn't much extra effort.
kisak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2008, 07:11 PM   #10
Bill M
Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stekemest
The pictures are upside down.
Perhaps if you were in Japan, on the other side the world from the USA, in the same position you were here, it would be the proper orientation..........
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008, 12:47 AM   #11
celtan
Member
 
celtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
Default

But that's exactly what happened! I was standing right beside Hachikō in Shibuya when I took that photo...



Best

: ) M

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marsh
Perhaps if you were in Japan, on the other side the world from the USA, in the same position you were here, it would be the proper orientation..........
celtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.