![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
|
![]()
The pictures are upside down.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 38
|
![]()
Greetings,
Yes, the image is upside down. After standing on my head for awhile I come up with "NOSHU (NO) JU KANEZANE SAKU KORE" which means KANEZANE (sword smiths name) a resident of NOSHU (MINO or present day GIFU providence) SAKU KORE (made this). The small stamp is what's known as a SHOWA stamp meaning it was made 1926 or later, till the end of the SHOWA era. This sword is likely made during WWII. The large stamp is called a KOKUIN, a counter mark with the kanji "Zane" in the center that we Americans call a turtle stamp. The red paint on the other side are assemblay numbers, worn but may be 26? He is listed as making Showato (machine made) and medium grade Gendaito (hand forged) blades. The formal style of kanji would indicate it is a Gendaito. To have a proper habaki made is expensive and you will be extremely lucky to find one that fits exactly. Hope this is of some help. Maskell Jerry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Thank you very much guys,
What do you know? So it was upside down! : ) Henk,Yep, it's in bad condition. I bought it just to rescue same from its owner. So far, I have only cleansed it with penetrating oil, the rust was awful, including some pitting. Ernest, I'm trying to buy a period tsuba/tsuka et al, but the proper polish is simply out of the question. At least, it will be better than it was... Jerry, your answer was very much appreciated, learned something new today. and it gives the blade more "personality". Best regards Manolo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Guys,
Got me a WWII Tsuba with all the trimmings. No habaki yet. I'm considering taking an alginate impression of the ricasso, making a stone-resin cat of the blade, and send same to have a habaki done. Regarding the tsuba. Surprise! It doesn't fit (but I won't yet quit). Is there any manner in which I may open the tsuba, without destroying the wrappings, so I may adapt same to the tang? Best Manolo BTW: Got me a couple more NCO swords, haven't had yet the time to clean them, so no pics just yet... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
You might be interested in knowing about this smith. Check my webpage at:
http://www.geocities.com/alchemyst/kanezane.htm Since this is a gunto (WW II military), I wouldn't be surprised if finding a habaki would be fairly easy as the blades had to be within military specs. Might try David MacDonald at: http://www.montanairon.com/swords.html Rich S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]() Quote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~steinrl/glossary.htm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Yep again. Tsuka it its. I bow to your knowledge, O' Kisak-san!.
![]() I believed the same was comprised of two wood halves held together by the combination of kabuto-gane, the ito, same, mekugi, and the fuchi.. So, how did they fit tsubas to the tang? Did they begin with the wood, and once finished , they did the sane-giso and the ito? And what is more important. How can I adapt a tsuka to the daito's tang without damaging the latter? Ooopsies! Sorry again, I meant nagako... : ) M Quote:
Last edited by celtan; 26th November 2008 at 01:19 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hey! Nice link, kisak. Thanks!
Best M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure how the cast-metal hilts on some WW2-era swords were fitted, but as these would most likely be mated to machine made blades, I guess more uniform tang dimensions, coupled with the fact that the demands on overall quality there seems to have been rather low, could have meant that they could just make these to a certain size and have that fit well enough. Of course, as many WW2-era swords took considerable shortcuts every here and there, they might have cheated a bit here too. Large amounts of washers (seppa) between grip and tsuba, and between the tsuba and habaki, could indicate that things weren't fitted properly. I've heard that one thing done by some modern day makers of reproduction katana use rip cores with slightly undersized slots for the tang, and then simply force them on so the wood is compressed, and a suitably sized slot created. Of course, this can make it near impossible to disassemble the sword, and risks cracks and other defects in the grip core. As for adapting the tsuka from one sword to the tang of another, I'm not sure of this is really done at all, at least not on "real" swords such as this one (the machine made ones with cast grips possibly being another matter). Altering the shape of the tang is as far as I can tell a pretty big no-no under most circumstances, and if you're unwrapping the grip, splitting the core, reshaping the slot (assuming this is even possible), and then reassembling everything (most likely needing new cord to wrap with), then getting an entirely new tsuka made probably isn't much extra effort. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
But that's exactly what happened! I was standing right beside Hachikō in Shibuya when I took that photo...
![]() Best : ) M Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|