![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,660
|
![]()
Jim and Henk,
Thank you for your responses. I agree that whoever was the original owner of my smallsword was on a tight budget and this was perhaps the best he could afford. The brass does not bear any traces of gilt, and is therefore as plain as it gets. Thanks for helping me narrow the time frame to the second half of the 18th century. Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
While these brass hilt weapons may well have been inexpensive, I am wondering if their simplicity may have been due to practicality, and intended as purely fighting pieces. I know that officers often had dress or levee swords, undress for official functions, and combat weapons which were pretty much strictly business. I also am wondering if a weapon such as this might have been in that category for maritime use by an officer.
The first thing everyone would say of course is 'where is the fouled anchor marking ?'. It is known of course that brass was favored in maritime hilts due to potential corrosion. Just things to consider. Still think its a quite handsome piece, but I like 'real deal' weapons, simple but effective. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 48
|
![]()
Hi Folks!
This is an interesting wee piece and I hope I can shed a bit more light on it. The blade is certainly an C18th piece and perfectly functional. It is difficult to ascertain much about the guard (any chance of a pic of the butterfly shell guard, lower face?), but proportions and form look original, as does the pommel. The grip appears to be original, and at one time has had a twisted wire wrapping, most likely steel and/or a combination of brass or copper wire. I would suggest though that the pas d`ane, ricasso and knucklebow are relatively recent additions. These do not appear to be cast, but soldered or brazed together from stock round section brass, certainly to replicate the basic form of an original style hilt. C18th smallswords with brass cast hilts were quite common in England, as they were the simplest and least expensive to make and buy. These can be found from c.1680`s onwards and were popular until the late C18th. In these examples however, the pas d`ane, knucklebow and ricasso are all one piece and usually with more detail in the casting. Here are a couple of examples of my own recent manufacture, but cast directly from original hilts in either case - ![]() ![]() ![]() Another giveaway in this case is the form of the ricasso. For this to be primarily functional, it needs to have flat surfaces for the forefinger and thumb to sit against when gripped for use. I hope that this is helpful towards identification. All the best, Macdonald |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,660
|
![]()
Paul,
Thank you very much, your explanation makes a ton of sense. The attached picture of the shell guard is the only one I have right now, and I can try to take a better one when I back home later today. As you can see, it lacks any detail, just like the knuckle bow. I also agree with you about the missing wire. Would you say that the patterns one sees on the grip are traces of the wire binding? The pommel is a different color than the rest of the hilt as well, with more reddish hues, perhaps due to more copper in the alloy. Best regards, Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 48
|
![]()
Hi Teodor,
No problem, happy to be of help ![]() The patterns in the grip are those of twisted wire binding. I might suggest that steel wire has formed at least some of the grip pattern wire, as it has indented into the softer brass. The same patterns can be found on originals where the wire has disappeared to leave a wooden core grip. Looking at the guard from that angle, I might also suggest that it is from a late C19th fencing foil. Any original C18th smallsword guard usually has something of a slight bowl or dished form to it, which this lacks. It is an identical guard as used by standard salle French fencing foils from the late C19th. I also noticed an unusual notch in the side of the blade near the guard. Looks like it has been either machined or filed for whatever reason? Hope the above helps. Yours Very Truly, Macdonald |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]()
may be an "épée de cour"
the sword of court is a weapon created in second half of the XVIIe century and used until the any end of the XVIIIe century. in France, during King time, everybody was having right to enter Versailles, nobody was allowed to enter Versailles Palace without bearing a sword for that, it was a business of rented swords at entrance, and for sure .. not first class weapons but, it's just an idea ![]() http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Smallsword.jpg http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89p%C3%A9e_de_cour à + Dom |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,660
|
![]()
Here is another one for comments.
The boat shaped hilt is brass(?) and was once gilted. The blade however I do not think is a smallsword one, and I suspect it might have been taken from one of those schlagers popular among German students in the 19th century. Could the hilt be earlier, from a smallsword, or is this simply a fancier schlager? I have attached some pictures and am looking forward to your comments. I will be gone for the next few days, so please excuse me if I am unable to answer responses to the thread. Regards, Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|