![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,613
|
![]()
Hi Fernando,
So true, so true, I suspect it's the same the world over. My Regards, Norman. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,141
|
![]()
Speaking of cannons, I missed out on this one the other week. Check out eBay item #170241460432. Seller said 1900? I'd say earlier, perhaps early 19th? What say you folks? Is this a signal cannon, small mortar, hand cannon, coehorn or ?
Last edited by M ELEY; 13th August 2008 at 08:40 PM. Reason: spelling! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,141
|
![]()
Any takers? I did notice this was a "private auction" with hidden buyers. I don't know much about these types of auctions, but I'm told they can be a little shady. Too bad, seems like an interesting piece...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Mark
Such a pitty you didn't get it; very serious stuff ... so it looks. Rather reinforced barrel, wide ( or worn) touch hole, large caliber ... meaning XIX century or even prior ? Not old enough to de considered a hand cannon, though ? Also not a coehorn mortar ... It would need trunnions placed low, by the breech, for the rotation, right ? It has a cascable, though ... was it moveable ? I'm glad there are no experts around, to shut me up ![]() Fernando |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
no trunnions, so likely not an aimable mortar or cannon, may have been strapped to a carriage of some sort, too big & too recent for a hand cannon. too short for much. s缠mall cannon were used for line throwing but would have had trunnions . small rail mounted anti-personnel cannon would have had trunnions to mount it on a swivel. my guess is a signal cannon for a larger ship.
coehorn mortar, trunnions on base ![]() small swivel gun, trunnions again ![]() this small late 18c - early 19c howitzer is close, but has trunnions again. ![]() lyle gun (line throwing) ![]() trunnions again - this is a big lyle. more traditional brass one in high polish ![]() here's the whole gubbins with the coast guard crew to service it. ![]() aha! a trunnion-less one mounted on a fixed base! ![]() this is a signal gun used to start yacht races note that 19-20c cannon of this type would have a lanyard operated percussion firing device threaded into it rather than a touch hole. removal would leave a larger hole than we'd expect for one fired by a slow match. ![]() one for a lyle gun Last edited by kronckew; 13th August 2008 at 11:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,141
|
![]()
Thanks for responding, guys. Fernando, you sound like you're closer to expert than you let on!
![]() Kronckew, thanks for posting all of these pics of some pretty cool cannons. That trunnion-less one in particular is interesting to see, as most either had them or were the older signal-types. I had never seen one without them until you posted this pic. I had thought deck gun, but of course they were all swivels, so your argument stands. Yes, in the early/mid-19th century, they started using a percussion firing system on deck cannons, ship signallers, and even on some swivel guns. I guess it was a lot easier than trying to use the old lit fuse. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi,
I am beginning to think that the 'Austrian cannon' may have been cut down, below the trunnions. If you look at this picture there seems to be some machined surfaces, the deep pit looks like a 'casting flaw'. Perhaps the pitted face is evidence of an original fracture cause by stress....and then was cut at that point ??? The other picture is another cannon of unusual form ![]() Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|