![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Thanks everyone.
Although as G.McCormack points out these clips are essentially stylised dance forms, it is possible to see how the Tulwar is weilded. The video clips are great! I love the one from the Chakram thread! See the assembled crowd falling back everytime the performers get close with the whirling blades. The clear difference in weilding these things is the wrist movements. A western Sabre or straight sword is used with a lot of 'up down' wrist movement. Straight 'slashes' or push cuts/lunges/stabs, occasional pull cuts, but certainly rapier or straigh forms are based on keep distance if possible. The Tulwar handle somewhat restricts movement (I have broad hands so find Tulwars almost impossible to hold tight) Whilst there is still some 'up down' movement, check out just how much side to side movement there is in the stylised forms in the clips. G.McC Thanks I see what you mean. Combat with these would be awfully close. Lots of pull cuts. I imagine some 'point work' would be used, but I take it that the vast bulk or moves are based on these wide pull slashes across the opponents body? Its such a complete contrast to the western forms, the graceful economy of movement (especially with the straight blade) that evolved here is gone, as is the lack of distance, it must have been hellishly bloody! Bollywood should use some of its ga-zillions of rupees to film a (non musical) hack and slash epic! Give the huge wealth of Inidan martial history a little 'crouching tiger' treatment. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,844
|
![]()
I am always a little cautious about fencing and combat. Is it one on one like a duel which is still not fencing as your life is at stake or just a free for all where one just attacks and blocks in a melee and hopefully survives. In combat reality "hopefully something I will never have to experience" I imagine it is a cross between a shambles and luck backed up by practise or skill. Either way its all quite unpleasant.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
I personally feel that Gatka is for the 'martial' use of the Tulwar, in that, it not only demonstates the sword play but increases coordination, stamina and balance.
I do not agree that it is just dance movements, a number of Martial arts had to go 'undercover' because of restrictions imposed by the ruling elite (including colonial rule) Capoeira was originally disguised as a dance as it was outlawed, but do not be fooled by the 'strange' dance like movements which are used as avoidance and well as attack. http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/capoeira.html With regards Gatka...I am not saying that swordsman entered the 'melee' like bionic windmills but techniques used would be effective. Especially, I feel, against 'regimented' cut and thrust techniques. I am not saying, either, that Gatka is the only way the Tulwar was used. Many martial arts involve 'dance'.... Martial Arts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_arts "......As mentioned above, some martial arts in various cultures can be performed in dance-like settings for various reasons, such as for evoking ferocity in preparation for battle or showing off skill in a more stylized manner. Many such martial arts incorporate music, especially strong percussive rhythms. Examples of such war dances include: • Buza - From Russia. • Panther Dance - Burmese Bando with swords (dha) • Gymnopaidiai - ancient Sparta • European Sword dance or Weapon dance of various kinds • Haka - New Zealand • Sabre Dance - depicted in Khachaturian's ballet Gayane • Maasai moran (warrior age-set) dances • Aduk-Aduk - Brunei • Ayyalah - Qatar • Khattak Dance - Afghanistan • Brazil's Capoeira, as well as some similar Afro-Caribbean arts • Dannsa Biodag - Scotland and Scottish sword dances • Hula & Lua - from the traditions of indigenous Hawaiian • Combat Hopak - From Ukraine • Yolah - From Oman/UAE ......" Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|