Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17th March 2008, 03:55 PM   #1
Pusaka
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
Default

I remember reading about the upas tree back in my school days, the locals perpetuated the story that the tree was so poisonous that no other living thing, plant or otherwise could live within a few meters radius of the tree

I have seen blades poisoned in the Philippines but I am not convinced by the method used. They fry poisonous spiders and worms together and then add acid. The blade is then dipped in this mixture and is considered poisoned. The thing is many venoms are protein based. If you expose the venom to high temperatures surly it will breakdown the protein and render the venom harmless. I think the same with plant toxins. If they are used during the forging of the blade when it is red hot then surly it will destroy the toxin.

If as they say the toxin was added during the forging than perhaps its as simple as quenching the blade in a strong solution of arsenic.

I don’t think it is a common practice and perhaps it was only done during battles but I don’t think it impossible since this has been done in several cultures. I remember reading how in ancient Ireland a battle took place in which sword blades were treated with a plant toxin (probably monkshood) so that even the slightest cut would be fatal.

But yes a blade soaked whilst cool is much more probable, dangerous thing though
Pusaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2008, 04:28 PM   #2
Lew
(deceased)
 
Lew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
Default

I have nicked myself once or twice on some keris and I am still here to talk about it . It makes a good story.



Lew
Lew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2008, 09:42 PM   #3
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
Default

There is no doubt that the sap of upas tree is very poisonous. I think that they used to give condemned criminals the job of going to collect it, as an alternative to execution. It was used as an arrow poison. I've just googleised "upas tree" and there's quite a bit there on it, which seems to more or less agree with what I can recall.
There is a poisonous frog in Jawa, but I don't know how poisonous, or if its poison was ever used on keris.
I personally think that it is possible that sometimes, some people may have applied poison to a keris blade before they entered a situation where they knew they would probably use the keris, but I have never heard of this as a general practice.

We can forget the arsenic as a blade poison. Arsenic does not work that way, and the tiny quantity that might be left on any blade would never do any damage anyway.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 06:01 AM   #4
PenangsangII
Member
 
PenangsangII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 401
Default

The keris is dipped into poison solution called baceman (snake head pickles mixed with human faeces) just before battle or fight. So, the poison would still be working. In the Peninsula, keris is sometimes hardened by dipping the red hot blade into upas / poison solution. The effect if stabbed by it is still a mystery though......
PenangsangII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 02:14 PM   #5
Bill S
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PenangsangII
The keris is dipped into poison solution called baceman (snake head pickles mixed with human faeces) just before battle or fight. So, the poison would still be working.
There are a few possible flaws in this theory. First, pickled snake heads would not be an effective poison. Snake venom would only be "still working" if the venom were extracted from the venom glands and put on the blade and used while still fresh. Pickling the heads does not do this. The human feces would definitely cause infection - but such infection would only set in days after a person was stabbed in battle and would not have any effect on the battlefield. And I've got doubts as to how many people keep jars of pickled snake heads and feces around the house.

This scenario also assumes that the keris was a battlefield weapon. I think there is plenty of support for its use as a weapon of personal defense/offense. But as a battlefield weapon it would fall short, and I'm not aware of its use in this context.
Bill S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 07:35 PM   #6
Pusaka
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PenangsangII
The keris is dipped into poison solution called baceman (snake head pickles mixed with human faeces) just before battle or fight. So, the poison would still be working. In the Peninsula, keris is sometimes hardened by dipping the red hot blade into upas / poison solution. The effect if stabbed by it is still a mystery though......
The only part of that formula which would work is the upas toxin, however if you applied the toxin to a redhot blade then I'm not so sure the toxin would survive that.
As for the snake venom, it usually has to be stored in a fridge to survive so pickled snakes head would not do much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill S
This scenario also assumes that the keris was a battlefield weapon. I think there is plenty of support for its use as a weapon of personal defense/offense. But as a battlefield weapon it would fall short, and I'm not aware of its use in this context.
True, the keris is actually not a very good weapon, a sword would be far better. I think the Kris is an improvement on the Keris as a weapon.
Pusaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 11:05 PM   #7
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
Default

For many, many years we have heard it repeated that the keris is not a particularly effective weapon.

I would suggest that used in the way and situation in which it is intended to be used, it is in fact an extremely effective weapon.

Comparison of a keris to a sword is pointless, as both have a different purpose.

A guitar string is a very effective weapon.

So is an AK47.

But both have different methods of application, and are used for different purposes.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008, 12:58 AM   #8
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,219
Default

Thanks for your statements here Alan, i was about to pose a very similar response.
I properly wielded keris can be a very deadly weapon, at least as effective as any other edged weapon in it's size class. No, it's not a big slashing sword like the Moro kris, but in a tight space like a hallway the Indo keris would probably be much better choice. It's stealthier and quicker too. Really depends on the situation.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008, 07:51 AM   #9
Marcokeris
Member
 
Marcokeris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
For many, many years we have heard it repeated that the keris is not a particularly effective weapon.

I would suggest that used in the way and situation in which it is intended to be used, it is in fact an extremely effective weapon.

Comparison of a keris to a sword is pointless, as both have a different purpose.

A guitar string is a very effective weapon.

So is an AK47.

But both have different methods of application, and are used for different purposes.
Not only a guitar string but also a thought can be a very effective weapon
Marcokeris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.