![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]()
I'm with the consensus on this. I also checked it out because it's Moro and the seller has a good rep. I do not think the handle belongs to the sword. The fit is all wrong. The handle it's self looks very well done. I've never been overly impressed with ivory. I'll take a nicely carved Bunti wood handle over most ivory any day. I was considering buying for the handle and finding something else to do with the rest. I have one or two blades that have no length because they have no handle!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Well, I'm also not fond of this kris.
However, the blade has a separate gangya. I'd like to see the Sulu blade cleaned and etched properly but I'd hazard a guess that this isn't a tourist blade. The hilt and scabbard have likely been added later as suggested (Mindanao). Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,308
|
![]()
Every bit of this puppy is recent. Even the hilt is recent. The is not the greatest compared to the older examples. I'm not too crazy about this,but if like new stuff.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|