Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd November 2006, 05:18 PM   #61
Dajak
Member
 
Dajak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 915
Default

Hi Michael take a look in the book ling rothpage 135
Attached Images
 
Dajak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2006, 05:32 PM   #62
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,635
Default

Yes, that's the quote I posted before and the source of Stone???

It's obviously an alternative spelling of the Iban parang aka Niabor, Njabor or Nyabor.
The genuine and old war sword of the Sea-Dayak (see Shelford etc.).
Maybe you could share a picture of it for this thread as a reference because, as you know, I don't have one myself yet?

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2006, 06:43 PM   #63
Dajak
Member
 
Dajak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 915
Default

http://old.blades.free.fr/swords/da...dayak_intro.htm


Over here you can look at the parang niabor I think they make an langueage
mistake

Here they talk about parang pedang but is an parang nabur but look it proves that the dayaks also used it
Attached Images
 
Dajak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2006, 06:58 PM   #64
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,635
Default

Yes,

In a way it's another language semi-mistake.
This is once again the Iban (parang) Pedang.
Described as having cross guard, not D-guard, and hollow at the hilt etc.
It seems that because Ling Roth puts parang in front of all the names earlier known from other sources it get's confusing.

Can we agree that it's all based on a misunderstanding by Stone, because of what Ling Roth wrote and that Ling Roth didn't show pictures of the swords he describes?

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2006, 07:39 PM   #65
Dajak
Member
 
Dajak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 915
Default

Hi Michael yes the problem is that if someone make s a mistake it will show
up in the later books The weapon as he discribes is an parang niabor with the rings and handle
and you can also hold it with 2 hands

Henry ling roth is talking german handle swords this could be the nabur

the parang pedang is an borneo sword and not an pirate sword

The problem with the pirates is that they not easy to talk with and the moment you see them you sail away or you never can tell what happend

And that we don t have pics people carrying them ling roth discribe the parang pandat as an seadayak sword and this could be true because landdayak have an different type

Ben
Dajak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2006, 09:05 PM   #66
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,635
Default

Hi Ben,

It seems as if you agree that the Parang Nabur as described in Stone is wrong?
He misunderstood Ling Roth's description of the Sea Dayak (parang) Niabor and put the "corrupted" name on another kind of sword from another region of Borneo?

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2006, 07:47 AM   #67
Dajak
Member
 
Dajak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 915
Default

Hi Michael yes he discribes the sword that I show the pics off we now that one as piso podang with the bataks see the pics

The parang pedang is an total different sword you have 2 by yourself
the one I have date before 1820 and one that you have too

Ben
Dajak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2006, 02:41 AM   #68
Bill M
Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,486
Default So where do we decide this comes from?

PI? Borneo?

Michael, we are a bit alike.....
Attached Images
      
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2006, 02:47 AM   #69
Bill M
Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,486
Default And this one also?

Parang Nabur?
Attached Images
      
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2006, 12:05 PM   #70
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,635
Default

Hi Bill,

Nice swords. I think you will find all the views of the forumites in this thread to form your own opinion on this debated issue.

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2006, 11:21 PM   #71
BSMStar
Member
 
BSMStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marsh
Parang Nabur?


Hi Bill,

Great swords!!! (Let me know if you get tired of them)

If these blades come from the PI (which I am inclined to believe they do), it seems that we can not come to a consensus on a name. I am not sure that we have agreed that they come from the PI.

If you look around a bit… rightly or wrongly, this sword “type”… in fact these very swords are universally referred to as being a Parang Nabur. It would seem to me, that no matter what we decide here, the label of Parang Nabur will still be out there for some time to come… even if a more correct name is found and applied.


Best regards,

Wayne
BSMStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2008, 09:54 PM   #72
comiso90
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Hey there..

It seems I have a sword very much like this... This is the first time in 30 years I've seen a photo of another.
Can anybody give me idea how much it would sell for?

I wish I had the scabbard!

thanks!
Attached Images
 
comiso90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2008, 04:27 AM   #73
comiso90
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default

I was very happy to find this thread.. it looks like I have somthing similiar.

where can I get more information?

How old?
uses? Ceremonial?
worth?

thanks
Attached Images
 
comiso90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2008, 07:56 PM   #74
Bill M
Member
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,486
Default

Comiso90,

Forum rules do not allow us to ask prices on this Forum. Since you are new, it will be forgiven and understood.

Tried to PM you with some info, but you are not enabled to receive. Suggest that you privately email or PM people who have swords like this for more information.
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2008, 08:07 PM   #75
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marsh
Comiso90,

Forum rules do not allow us to ask prices on this Forum. Since you are new, it will be forgiven and understood.

Tried to PM you with some info, but you are not enabled to receive. Suggest that you privately email or PM people who have swords like this for more information.


Indeed, no great sin to have asked, as the established members know just to not answer, but please read the posting rules and guidelines at the top of the forum.

Mark
Vikingsword Staff
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2008, 09:21 PM   #76
comiso90
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default

sorry... didnt realize..

I'm just happy to find people that recognize it!
comiso90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2008, 10:08 AM   #77
Daniel Hdz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
Default Nabor or Visayan Bolo

Erik Farrow lead me to this site so I could get more info and replies from some experts in this field. Pictures of my fathers sword are attached. Comments and contact will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Dan.
Attached Images
   
Daniel Hdz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2008, 11:38 PM   #78
Daniel Hdz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
Default Philippine sword...

Erik Farrow advised me on this sword that my dad has had since the early 60's. He says it has been incorrectly labeled as being from Sea Dayak. He also lead me to this site so I could get some comments from the experts. Any info. you can share with me is very much appreciated. I nor my dad are big collectors, however he was given this sword by an employer when he was very young and he's had it displayed on our wall at home. Also I'm not sure if I have been adding the photos correctly. Can anyone help?

Thank you,
Dan
Attached Images
   
Daniel Hdz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2008, 11:46 PM   #79
Daniel Hdz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
Default Seems as though I could attach photos.

Here are a few more.
Attached Images
      
Daniel Hdz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008, 10:04 AM   #80
VVV
Member
 
VVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Hdz
Erik Farrow advised me on this sword that my dad has had since the early 60's. He says it has been incorrectly labeled as being from Sea Dayak. He also lead me to this site so I could get some comments from the experts. Any info. you can share with me is very much appreciated. I nor my dad are big collectors, however he was given this sword by an employer when he was very young and he's had it displayed on our wall at home. Also I'm not sure if I have been adding the photos correctly. Can anyone help?

Thank you,
Dan


Hello Dan,

Yours is a very nice variation of the same Luzon swords as in this thread.
You can find all the information we have on it at the moment here and also in this thread.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showt...p?t=1792&page=3

If you ever get tired of it...

Michael
VVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008, 09:48 PM   #81
Daniel Hdz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
Default Thanks.

What's the best and safest way to clean this beauty.
Daniel Hdz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.