![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,459
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you so much for suggesting posting this on the thread on markings! I was just thinking that as I read the thread and then saw your post. It's really interesting that these marks on the back of the blade are somewhat like the back of some SE Asian weapons, which was just mentioned on the thread on marking of weapons:anthropologically and sociologically ( geez I need a shorter title!) . Anyway, it seems on the SE Asian weapons these marks might be tribal and possibly even, as this, family identifying. All very best regards, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Thanks Carlos,
I am very impressed with these links, I will have to study the PDF file a bit closer but I upon a quick look I could not see this knife listed, maybe you can identify it a bit quicker? Jim, always happy to help where I can, not that I want to wish my working life away but I do often wish I was retired so I could find much more time to offer up more info that I have available for posts. All in good time I guess, as the Balinese say, softly slowly catch the monkey. All the best forumites Gav |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|