![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
Very good point Jens. Much like the weapons being produced in varying locations , the locations of actual minting were not necessarily the location where the product was used. Thank you for noting the coins using the katar as a mark....reminds me of the great photos of Nepalese coins with kukris on them that Spiral shared in a previous thread.
BTW, the shape of this katar hilt looks very much like the 'garsoe' katar in Egerton (#727 I think). All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 87
|
![]()
Brilliant inspiring and insightful thread, thank you
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
Thank you so much for those very kind words Sikh Soldier! Jens has indeed done so much in comprehensively acquiring, studying and advancing the study of the most important weapons of India. This he constantly illustrates with the fantastic pieces he shares, and as seen here, with the topics he selects.
All very best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
In Indian Arms and Armour, vol. II, G. N. Pant, pages 79 and 80.
Sirohi or Serye. The name is derived form a village Sirohi in Rajasthan where the swords are even made today. The blade is slightly curved and is of a very hard temper. It was in great favour with the Rajputs. Egerton says, “the chief favourite of all the various kinds (of swords) found in Rajputana is the Sirohi, a slightly curved blade shaped like that of Damascus. ……. Pant also, in a note, writes that they, at Wallace Collection have two swords #1440 and 1446, which in the catalogue are named as being Sirohi, but although he mentions that he has never seen the swords, he writes that they ‘are certainly not Sirohi’. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|