![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 87
|
![]()
So not a Khanda then!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
I agree Lew, reproduction of early iron age 'antennae' type swords or the LaTene type.
Nothing to do with Khanda. We have been talking a lot on khandas lately though Sikh Soldier. I think the threads discussing them have developed some pretty good discussion on these. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
I aggree, after watching a documentry on the rise and fall of the Celtic tribes I too agree with Lew and Jim, many such examples were shown last night on the ABC television here in Brisbane.
regards Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 87
|
![]()
Oh thank god it was described as a "South Indian broadsword Khanda with a rare ritual Vajra handle"
I was thinking of putting in an offer, Thanks Jim I will read up on that post, i obviously do not know nearly enough ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Hi Sikh Soldier,
Knowledge is the most important weapon for any arms collector! This is why we are here, to learn together and share our discoveries, in both that and the weapons themselves which truly help us learn and understand. I did not immediately recognize what that hilt was, but knew that it was certainly not a khanda. I suspected it was a very early hilt form, which was confirmed promptly by Lews post, and a quick check revealed very similar 'antennae' type hilts as described. I'm glad you checked with us as you did and hope others will as well, as so many do before purchases or bids on weapons they are not familiar with. I cannot even imagine such a description captioning this weapon! All very best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi,
I recently found this picture of a painting, (which I believe is 18th C and housed in a museum in New Delhi) Notice the Khanda shaped blade...which seems to be 'crucifix' hilted (which seems to have a small langet similar to the African Kaskara) I thought this may be 'artistic licence' but, all the other swords shown are the same as each other, but not the same as the only Khanda blade. Perhaps there were differently hilted Khanda (However, I am not suggesting the sword that started this thread is a Khanda but this does seem relevent to the thread) Kind Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
The early 'khandas' in India depicted in the iconography indeed were simple hilts without guards typically. The hilt with developed knuckleguard evolved primarily with the influence of European swords, and began the advent of the familiar khanda form often termed 'Hindu basket hilt'. This is certainly not to see that the knuckleguard was not known in India prior to the European influence, but that its presence was quite limited in the regions where the khanda predominated.
Very good point however, the khanda of India did indeed have a spectrum of variation not only as it evolved, but as other influences and diffusion reflected in the variations. This example 'antennae' sword as suggested does appear to be a quite modern interpretation of these ancient iron age swords, and not associated with sword forms known in India. However, I do think it is interesting that the Indian dagger known as the 'chilanum' does seem to carry this 'anthromorphic' theme in degree. I have always considered the weaponry of India reflective in that it seems to carry weapon influences from subtle to considerable in degree, of not only other cultures, but ancient forms as well. Nicely observed David! ![]() All best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|