![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
![]()
Alan, you are correct I am talking about the original purpose. If we take the 'form follows function' approach there should be a reason it is like it is. Thanks for clarifying my question
cheers David |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|