![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]() Quote:
Looks Thai to me as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,086
|
![]()
There is no evidence of old resin or any other form of adhesive so I don't think it ever had a handle. Maybe it is an apprentice piece or something like that? Interesting that it should survive if it is.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
I've been playing with the idea that maybe it was meant to be mounted on a bamboo handle, hence the thick tang. That doesn't make that a lot of sense (wouldn't it shatter the bamboo through internal work?), but it was the only thing I could think of. The idea of it being an experimental piece makes more sense.
F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Rsword,
Can you tell me what the actual measurements on this piece are? You know how much I like oddball items. ![]() Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,086
|
![]() Quote:
As mentioned, the tang is 4" long and 1/2" thick. The forged part of the blade is 10 3/4" long as measured from the tang to the "clipped" point. It is 3" wide at the widest point towards the point. It definately meets the oddball classification! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
You've got mail
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
It has arrived and I am very pleased with it. I have found out that this style of point is called "baby chick's head" in Thai. I also agree with Rsword that because of the tang that it is either a polearm blade or that of farming tool. I'm leaning more toward the polearm just because of the shape of the tip.
Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|