![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Hi Jose,
The hilt is a very dense hard wood not the horn that you would expect to see on a Philippine dagger. That is one of the thing that has me wondering where this is from. The quillons on the guard like I said above are dove-tailed into the central section which I'm guessing is an old repair. I can't get a good picture to show the way they are done. The sheath came with it when I bought it. I'm sure that originally came with a leather one. This one looks like a tombak sheath to me. Robert Last edited by Robert Coleman; 25th October 2007 at 01:20 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I agree - it looks like a tombak sheath. However, the blade is Ilocano without question. Different guards were used when ever they could find them is would seem. I do agree though that this guard is a little unusual for a PI Katipunan dagger. STill I think you have a PI piece.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Jose,
That's great. I'm glad that you think it is Pi. That way it fits in with the rest of my collection. I'm thinking this is late 19th to early 20th century. What are you thoughts on this? Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I think you are on target.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|