![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Ben,
Quote:
![]() Do you have reliable provenance/dating for your piece? Would be great to get additional data on these nice blades! Quote:
To me, the blade would be most important, anyway. And that can always be older than the fittings... Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Here some pics about the blade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Ben,
Quote:
The hilt seems to be well worn with good quality banati/bunti wood used for the pommel. Any hints on the date when this piece got collected? ![]() ![]() BTW, Ben, did you received my email/PM on the other blades? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
I am inclined to believe that the MOP is a later tendency, no earlier than the turn of the century. It is also possible that the scabbard is later. The actual barong seems to be no older than the turn of the century and of Samal influence. The scabbard however seems to be of Samal in carving and Borneo influence in shape and size. I do like the chasing decoration on the silver punto at top and bottom.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|