![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Perhaps, my question was not formulated well.
From the top: while not all Bukharan handles have rivets at all, and some may have 3 rivets, the presence of 5 rivets identifies the handle as Bukharan. Would that be correct? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
The way i read the text in Torben W. Flindt’s article on page 23, it says. “Hilts. When wood or horn were used, the gripshells were held together by three to five rather large iron rivets whose size may be regarded as a Bukharan Characteristic.”
To me it seems as if Torben means, not only the number of rivets, but also the size of the iron rivets. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Correct; I mentioned the size in my original posting.
My examples, however, have 5 small rivets. Whereas some Bukharan weapons could have had 3 rivets, do you know of any piece ( Afghani, Indian or Persian) that has 5 rivets (any size) and is not Bukharan? If the "5-rivet" sign is valid, that would simplify ID of weapons in the future. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Ariel,
In Arms and Armour, Rolli books, 2005 by E. Jaiwant Paul, page 72, you can see these two. The text to the one with the dark hilt does not say much, other than it is in the National Museum, about the other one he writes that it is from Mysore, 18th century AD, National Museum. I don’t know what Torben Flindt ment about the rivets, but could it be, that the ends of the rivets used in Bukhara were bigger than the ends used elsewhere? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Looking at Artzi's site, he has examples of 2-rivet, 3-rivet, 5-rivet and even 4-rivet handles on weapons from Bukhara, but only one would conceivably qualify for " large-ish" rivets.
http://www.oriental-arms.com/photos.php?id=434 http://www.oriental-arms.com/item.php?id=417 http://www.oriental-arms.com/item.php?id=1321 http://www.oriental-arms.com/item.php?id=2215 http://www.oriental-arms.com/item.php?id=2029 One of my pseudoshashkas ( the leftmost one) has Afghani stamps from Mazar-i-Sharif ( admittedly Uzbeki territory), and 3 rather large rivets. The peshkabzes you show, IMHO, are unlikely to be made in Mysore: too far South for a typically Northern weapon. Were they brought assembled from Bukhara? Who knows... And, in general, Paul's book does not impress me as a reliable source of info. My bottom line: small rivets can come from everywhere; large ones are more likely to come from Uzbeki tradition. Three rivets are of no help, but 5 rivets are likely to come from Bukhara. Five large rivets clinch the deal. Agreed? Sounds like a Sherlock Holmes' title " The case of five large rivets" ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
What do we have here ariel ?
Bukharan ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
mmmm very nice Rick, the oblique cross cut of dark rhino horn is typicaly Bukharan.
The 5 small rivets pattern was certanly common in 19th century English made knives. Not sure whether thats relevant or not? Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|