Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 7th August 2007, 01:38 PM   #1
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Hello Battara,

I'm with Willem on this.

However, I have to note that hulu puntung and hulu dandan are also very nice to hold/use. Despite their neverending variations, traditional hilts on SE Asian blades seem to be primarily designed for ergonomic function and only secondarily for display purposes...

Quote:
I have heard that the rencong hilts that ends in an "L" shape is for ceremonial purposes and the others are for battle. Is there any truth to this?
There are quite a few very basic rencong with hulu meuccange which would speak against this notion: those who only could afford a single blade would certainly make no compromises as to function.

If I recall correctly, the Dutch outlawed rencong and many hulu meuccange got shortened into hulu puntung to make it more easily concealable. Still need to verify this story though...

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007, 01:44 PM   #2
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Hello Maurice,

I believe your blade is pretty recent; I'm not sure it was produced on Sumatra either.

I haven't seen any antique northern Sumatran blade with fossil elephant molar fittings - I'd guess those folks were just too much concerned about durability and other practical issues...

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007, 04:05 PM   #3
asomotif
Member
 
asomotif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,228
Default

Small addition.

KNIL soldiers where also using the rencong as an additional weapon.
So the rencongs that were taken from the locals were distributed amongst the KNIL soldiers as a personal close combat weapon.

I once had a rencong where the L shaped hilt was simply sawn of and the scabbard was marked with a 'V' not something a Acehnese warrior would do.
asomotif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2007, 06:56 PM   #4
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
Default

Thank you all...

Another question then, what about pamor blades on these - older or not make a difference?
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2007, 08:50 PM   #5
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Hello Jose,

Quote:
Another question then, what about pamor blades on these - older or not make a difference?
I don't think there are any hard rules: blades with contrasting pamor and blades with subtle laminations from forging seem to have coexisted without any strong correlations with estimated age or status: e.g. there are some antique, gold fitted rencong with "plain" blades...

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2007, 04:03 AM   #6
Dajak
Member
 
Dajak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
Default

The pamor blade s that are not polished are mosty new ones .

Ben
Dajak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2007, 10:08 PM   #7
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
Default

W W!
I did not know these things - thank you all very much.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2007, 10:47 PM   #8
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Quote:
The pamor blade s that are not polished are mosty new ones .
Hello Ben,

I assume you mean blades strongly etched and stained with warangan? Also the pamor looks off in those modern repros...

Even worse are those heavily etched blades with raised writing (protected by wax) on them! Often their blade shape is also not traditional.

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.